Indian Law Bulletins  |  Federal Courts of Appeals  |  Current


Last updated: October 30, 2009

Next update should be ready by: November 13, 2009

Selected Indian Law Cases Discovered: Through October 30, 2009

Please alert us to any cases we may have missed from the U.S. Courts of Appeals.


Nkihtaqmikon v. Impson
2009 WL 3448231
No. 08-2122
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, October 28, 2009

Subjects: not yet available

*Synopsis: Following dismissal, 462 F.Supp.2d 86, of action challenging Bureau of Indian Affairs' (BIA) approval of Indian tribe's decision to lease tribal land to be used for a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal, appeal was taken. The Court of Appeals, 503 F.3d 18, affirmed in part and remanded in part, and BIA filed a second motion to dismiss. On remand, the United States District Court for the District of Maine, John A. Woodcock, Jr., J., 573 F.Supp.2d 311, granted motion. Plaintiffs appealed.

*Holding: The Court of Appeals, Boudin, Circuit Judge, held that Court of Appeals' prior ruling that administrative exhaustion was mandatory was the law of the case. Affirmed.

United States v. Espinosa
581 F.3d 826
No. 08-3354
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, September 18, 2009

Subjects: not yet available

*Synopsis: Defendant was convicted of aggravated sexual abuse and abusive sexual contact, following jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, Charles B. Kornmann, Senior District Judge. Defendant appealed.

*Holding:The Court of Appeals, Smith, Circuit Judge, held that:
(1) conviction for aggravated sexual abuse was supported by sufficient evidence;
(2) evidence was insufficient to show that child's age was below twelve when
alleged sexual contact occurred, as required to support conviction for abusive
sexual contact;
(3) mistrial was not warranted due to psychiatrist's testimony that it was her
opinion that child had suffered sexual abuse;
(4) statements from witnesses attesting to child's alleged prior consistent
statements accusing defendant of abuse were not hearsay.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

 

A service of the National Indian Law Library of the Native American Rights Fund


A note about links used in this document

Text highlighted in blue are links to information available on the Internet free of charge. Text highlighted in green are links to information available on Westlaw, for the convenience of those who have a Westlaw account. Please contact the National Indian Law Library if you need help obtaining legal documents.

The National Indian Law Library and Native American Rights Fund are not affiliated with Westlaw. See www.westlaw.com for more information about the Westlaw legal databases.

* Synopsis and holding provided under an agreement with Westlaw.com www.westlaw.com