%PDF-1.3
%%
%%Page: 1 1
4 0 obj
<<
/Length 5 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 664.5 Tm
/F1 13 Tf 100 Tz
88.1395 -8.4 Td
1.3 Tw
0 Tc
(FOR PUBLICATION) Tj
/F1 15 Tf 100 Tz
-78.2395 -24 Td
1.5 Tw
(UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS) Tj
43.47 -16 Td
(FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-53.37 -18 Td
1.2 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
0 0 Td
183.8 0 Td
/F3 20 Tf 100 Tz
-2.18 -17.6 Td
2 Tw
() Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-181.62 -2.8 Td
1.2 Tw
(A) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(OST) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(ONTAINMENT) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( S) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(YSTEM) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(; A) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(NTHONY) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( D.) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(R) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(ODGERS) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(, in his official capacity as) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(Director of the Arizona Health) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(Care Cost Containment System,) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
76.332 -13.2 Td
(Plaintiffs-Appellees,) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
6.168 -18 Td
(v.) Tj
-82.5 -18 Td
(M) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARK) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( B. M) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(, in his) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(official capacity as administrator) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(of the Centers for Medicare and) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(Medicaid Services; M) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(IKE) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( L) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(EAVITT) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(,) Tj
215.07 -3.6 Td
(No. 05-16386) Tj
-215.07 -9.6 Td
(in his official capacity as) Tj
226.734 -8.4 Td
(D.C. No.) Tj
-226.734 -4.8 Td
(Secretary of the US Department of) Tj
/F3 20 Tf 100 Tz
181.62 -3.1 Td
2 Tw
() Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
20.382 -5.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(CV-03-02445-PGR) Tj
-202.002 -4.8 Td
(Health and Human Services; T) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(HE) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(ENTERS FOR) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( M) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(EDICARE AND) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
224.34 0 Td
1.2 Tw
(OPINION) Tj
-224.34 -13.2 Td
(M) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(EDICAID) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( S) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(ERVICES) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(; T) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(HOMAS) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( A.) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(S) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(CULLY) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(, Administrator, in his) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(official capacity as administrator) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(of the Centers for Medicare and) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(Medicaid Services; D) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(EPARTMENT OF) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(H) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( & H) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(UMAN) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( S) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(ERVICES) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(;) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(T) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(OMMY) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
( G. T) Tj
/F2 8.4 Tf 101.1 Tz
.79 Tw
(HOMPSON) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.2 Tw
(, in his) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(official capacity as Secretary of) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(the US Department of Health and) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
(Human Services,) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
61.008 -13.2 Td
(Defendants-Appellants.) Tj
/F3 20 Tf 100 Tz
120.612 -8.8 Td
1.6 Ts
2 Tw
() Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-142.878 -26.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(Appeal from the United States District Court) Tj
46.206 -13.2 Td
(for the District of Arizona) Tj
-45.282 -13.2 Td
(Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 664.5 cm
0 G
.9 w 0 -65.95 m 183.8 -65.95 l s
1.2 w 186.6 -242.3 m 186.6 -73.8 l s
1.2 w 186.6 -427.8 m 186.6 -259.3 l s
.9 w 0 -434.75 m 183.3 -434.75 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
292.25 -664.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15641) Tj
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
4399
endobj
3 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 10 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F3 8 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 4 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 2 2
12 0 obj
<<
/Length 13 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
94.47 -8.4 Td
1.2 Tw
0 Tc
(Argued and Submitted) Tj
-47.526 -13.2 Td
(May 15, 2007San Francisco, California) Tj
43.266 -26.2 Td
(Filed December 3, 2007) Tj
-72.324 -26.2 Td
(Before: Diarmuid) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(F.) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(O'Scannlain and Sandra) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(S.) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(Ikuta,) Tj
3.492 -13.2 Td
(Circuit) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(Judges, and Leonard) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(B.) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(Sand,*) Tj
( Senior) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(Judge.) Tj
70.326 -26.2 Td
(Opinion by Judge Ikuta) Tj
1 0 0 1 156 189.7 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
148.5 -1 Td
1.2 Tw
0 Tc
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
-138.5 -26 Td
1.02 Tw
(*The Honorable Leonard B. Sand, Senior United States District Judge) Tj
-10 -11.2 Td
1 Tw
(for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 189.7 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -12.75 m 300 -12.75 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15642) Tj
64.9314 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
13 0 obj
1605
endobj
11 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 10 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 12 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 3 3
15 0 obj
<<
/Length 16 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
120.996 -27.6 Td
1.2 Tw
0 Tc
(COUNSEL) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-120.996 -26.2 Td
.25 Tw
(Jonathan H. Levy, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice,) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(Washington, D.C., for the defendants-appellants. ) Tj
0 -26.2 Td
2.47 Tw
(Charles A. Miller and Donald J. Ridings Jr., Covington &) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(Burling, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiffs-appellees. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
123.666 -44.2 Td
(OPINION) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
-123.666 -26.2 Td
(IKUTA, Circuit Judge: ) Tj
12 -26.2 Td
3.85 Tw
(This appeal requires us to resolve conflicting statutory) Tj
-12 -13.2 Td
.21 Tw
(interpretations of ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.21 Tw
(402\(e\) of the Indian Health Care Improve-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.91 Tw
(ment Act, 42 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.91 Tw
(1396d\(b\), which requires the federal) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.07 Tw
(government to pay 100 percent of certain Medicaid costs for) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
0 Tw
(services ) Tj
(which are received through an Indian Health Service) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.28 Tw
(facility.) Tj
() Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(1) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( The Arizona Health ) Tj
(Care Cost Containment System) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -8.15 m 300 -8.15 l s
.5 w 0 -131.15 m 300 -131.15 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 284.3 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -1 Td
1.2 Tw
0 Tc
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -26 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(1) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
1 Tw
(42 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1 Tw
(1396d\(b\) states, in pertinent part: ) Tj
8 -16.2 Td
.07 Tw
(Notwithstanding the first sentence of this section [explaining how) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
.75 Tw
(the ) Tj
(Federal medical assistance percentage,) Tj
( the federal share of) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
.35 Tw
(Medicaid expenses, will be calculated for each state], the Federal) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
3.21 Tw
(medical assistance percentage shall be 100 per centum with) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1.47 Tw
(respect to amounts expended as medical assistance for services) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
2.8 Tw
(which are received through an Indian Health Service facility) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1.46 Tw
(whether operated by the Indian Health Service or by an Indian) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1.62 Tw
(tribe or tribal organization \(as defined in section 1603 of Title) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1 Tw
(25\). ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 284.3 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -12.75 m 300 -12.75 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15645) Tj
-207.5686 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
3064
endobj
14 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 10 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 15 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 4 4
19 0 obj
<<
/Length 20 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
1.14 Tw
0 Tc
(\() Tj
(Arizona) Tj
(\), the state entity that administers Arizona's Med-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.12 Tw
(icaid program, interprets this language as requiring the federal) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.58 Tw
(government to reimburse states for all health care services) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.78 Tw
(provided to Medicaid-eligible Indians under referral agree-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2 Tw
(ments between health care service providers and the Indian) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.75 Tw
(Health Service \() Tj
(IHS) Tj
(\). By contrast, the Health Care Financ-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.94 Tw
(ing Administration \() Tj
(HCFA) Tj
(\),) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(2) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( the federal entity that admin-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
4.38 Tw
(isters Medicaid, interprets this language as requiring the) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.08 Tw
(federal government to reimburse states only for health care) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.6 Tw
(services provided by ) Tj
(an IHS facility which offers, is respon-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.77 Tw
(sible for and bills Medicaid for the services provided.) Tj
( The) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.61 Tw
(district court held that Arizona's interpretation was correct) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.95 Tw
(and granted Arizona's motion for summary judgment. We) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
4.07 Tw
(have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
4.07 Tw
(1291 and now) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(reverse. ) Tj
148.002 -26.4 Td
(I) Tj
-136.002 -26.3 Td
1.88 Tw
(As part of its unique government-to-government relation-) Tj
-12 -13.3 Td
.33 Tw
(ship with American Indian Tribes and Alaska Native corpora-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.71 Tw
(tions, the federal government provides health care services to) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.87 Tw
(roughly 1.9 million American Indian and Alaska Native peo-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.2 Tw
(ple. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(25 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.2 Tw
(1601; ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Lincoln v. Vigil) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 508 U.S. 182, 185) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
6.38 Tw
(\(1993\); IHS Fact Sheet \(2007\), http://info.ihs.gov/Files/) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.5 Tw
(IHSFacts-Jan2007.doc \(last visited November 7, 2007\). Since) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.52 Tw
(1955, the IHS, now a federal agency within the Department) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.21 Tw
(of Health and Human Services \() Tj
(HHS) Tj
(\), has been responsible) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
3.41 Tw
(for providing these services. From its inception, IHS had) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.75 Tw
(sought to accomplish its objectives primarily by building and) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.4 Tw
(staffing its own facilities on or near Indian communities. Am.) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.25 Tw
(Indian Policy Review Comm'n, Report on Indian Health 94,) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.9 Tw
(105 \(Comm. Print 1976\). Geographical, logistical, and finan-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.6 Tw
(cial limitations made it impossible for IHS to provide the full) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -26 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
2.18 Tw
(2) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Although the Health Care Financing Administration \() Tj
(HCFA) Tj
(\) was) Tj
-10 -11.2 Td
2.03 Tw
(renamed the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 66 Fed. Reg.) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
.96 Tw
(35,437 \(July 5, 2001\), we will use the term HCFA, which was the name) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1 Tw
(of the federal agency during the time period at issue here. ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -444.15 m 300 -444.15 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15646) Tj
64.9314 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
20 0 obj
4055
endobj
18 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 10 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 19 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 5 5
22 0 obj
<<
/Length 23 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
1.55 Tw
0 Tc
(range of medical services in this manner, and IHS routinely) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.91 Tw
(entered into different types of agreements with other health) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.39 Tw
(services providers to fill in gaps in IHS services. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Id. ) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(at 105.) Tj
12 -26 Td
.92 Tw
(In 1965, the Medicaid program was signed into law. Med-) Tj
-12 -13 Td
1 Tw
(icaid, a joint federal and state medical welfare program, pro-) Tj
0 -13 Td
2.67 Tw
(vides for state Medicaid agencies to reimburse health care) Tj
0 -13 Td
.48 Tw
(providers for the cost of covered services delivered to Medic-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.53 Tw
(aid beneficiaries. 42 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.53 Tw
(1396, 1396a. The federal gov-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.6 Tw
(ernment then reimburses the states for all or part of those) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
4.28 Tw
(expenditures. 42 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
4.28 Tw
(1396b, 1396d\(b\). The rate at) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.92 Tw
(which the federal government reimburses the states for Med-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.57 Tw
(icaid expenditures, called the ) Tj
(federal medical assistance per-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.36 Tw
(centage, or ) Tj
(FMAP,) Tj
( typically ranges from 50 to 83 percent.) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.1 Td
2 Tw
(See ) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(42 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
2 Tw
(1396d\(b\). The federal government recalcu-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.75 Tw
(lates the FMAP reimbursement rate annually based on each) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.67 Tw
(state's per capita income. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See id.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.67 Tw
(1396d\(b\), 1301\(a\)\(8\)\(B\).) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.9 Tw
(Although Medicaid-eligible Indians were entitled to use non-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(IHS service providers to the same extent as other citizens of) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.41 Tw
(a state, the degree to which Indians actually benefitted from) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.18 Tw
(the newly established Medicaid programs is ) Tj
(unclear.) Tj
( Report) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(on Indian Health, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(supra) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, at 85. ) Tj
12 -26 Td
.44 Tw
(In 1976, Congress found that many IHS facilities were ) Tj
(in-) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
6.88 Tw
(adequate, outdated, inefficient, and undermanned,) Tj
( and) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(enacted the Indian Health Care Improvement Act \() Tj
(IHCIA) Tj
(\)) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.41 Tw
(to ) Tj
(implement the Federal responsibility for the care and edu-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.63 Tw
(cation of the Indian people by improving the services and) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.38 Tw
(facilities of Federal Indian health programs and encouraging) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.42 Tw
(maximum participation of Indians in such programs.) Tj
( IHCIA,) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.5 Tw
(Pub. L. No. 94-437, 90 Stat. 1400 \(1976\). Title IV of the) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.04 Tw
(IHCIA contained numerous provisions aimed at upgrading the) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(overall quality of IHS facilities. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(IHCIA ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(401-03. ) Tj
12 -26 Td
1.42 Tw
(Relevant here, ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.42 Tw
(402\(a\) of the IHCIA amended the Social) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
.4 Tw
(Security Act to permit IHS facilities to obtain Medicaid reim-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.61 Tw
(bursement for services provided to Medicaid-eligible Indians.) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.1 Td
0 Tw
(See ) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(IHCIA ) Tj
( ) Tj
(402\(a\), 42 U.S.C. ) Tj
( ) Tj
(1396j. As a result, IHS facil-) Tj
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15647) Tj
-207.5686 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
4190
endobj
21 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 10 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 22 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 6 6
25 0 obj
<<
/Length 26 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
1.66 Tw
0 Tc
(ities could receive reimbursement from Medicaid as well as) Tj
0 -13 Td
.4 Tw
(funding through direct Congressional appropriations. Because) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.91 Tw
(states previously did not provide Medicaid funding for IHS) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.71 Tw
(health care services, this enactment would have imposed an) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.12 Tw
(additional burden on states' Medicaid programs. To avoid this) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.81 Tw
(result, Congress amended ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
2.81 Tw
(1905\(b\) of the Social Security) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.66 Tw
(Act, 42 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
2.66 Tw
(1396d\(b\), by inserting the following lan-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(guage: ) Tj
22 -26 Td
3.55 Tw
(Notwithstanding the first sentence of this section) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.66 Tw
([explaining how the ) Tj
(federal medical assistance per-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.21 Tw
(centage will be calculated for each state], the Fed-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.67 Tw
(eral medical assistance percentage shall be 100 per) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.04 Tw
(centum with respect to amounts expended as medical) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.33 Tw
(assistance for services ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(which are received through) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(an Indian Health Service facility.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( ) Tj
-22 -26 Td
(IHCIA ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(402\(e\), 42 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(1396d\(b\) \(emphasis added\). ) Tj
12 -26 Td
.82 Tw
(Immediately after the enactment of the IHCIA, and for the) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
.87 Tw
(next twenty years, HCFA interpreted this language as requir-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
0 Tw
(ing a FMAP reimbursement rate of 100 percent for health care) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.38 Tw
(services provided by IHS for Medicaid-eligible Indians, when) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.06 Tw
(IHS billed Medicaid directly for those services. HCFA did not) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.3 Tw
(allow a FMAP reimbursement rate of 100 percent for health) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.62 Tw
(care services provided by non-IHS providers, even when IHS) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(had entered into referral agreements with those providers. ) Tj
12 -26 Td
.75 Tw
(HCFA's interpretation of ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.75 Tw
(402\(e\) corresponded to the dif-) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
2.25 Tw
(ferent types of agreements IHS had used to supplement its) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(services. In some cases, an IHS facility would offer a health) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.97 Tw
(care service to its Indian patients, and provide the service by) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.26 Tw
(purchasing it from a contractor \(a non-IHS health service pro-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.07 Tw
(vider\). After the enactment of the IHCIA, IHS billed Medic-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.48 Tw
(aid directly for these services. IHS also entered into referral) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.66 Tw
(agreements with non-IHS providers. Under these agreements,) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.15 Tw
(the non-IHS provider agreed to furnish medical services at a) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.48 Tw
(rate no higher than the prevailing Medicare allowable rates to) Tj
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15648) Tj
64.9314 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
3641
endobj
24 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 10 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 25 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 7 7
28 0 obj
<<
/Length 29 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
3.2 Tw
0 Tc
(Medicaid-eligible Indians referred by IHS. Reimbursement) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
1.33 Tw
(Rates for Health Care Services Authorized Under the Indian) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
1.18 Tw
(Health Service Contract Health Service Regulations, 51 Fed.) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
1.73 Tw
(Reg. 23,540 \(June 30, 1986\). IHS did not bill Medicaid for) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
3.85 Tw
(such services. Before 1997, Arizona neither received nor) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
1.3 Tw
(claimed a FMAP reimbursement rate of 100 percent for ser-) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
.42 Tw
(vices provided to Medicaid-eligible Indians under these refer-) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
1.2 Tw
(ral agreements. ) Tj
12 -24.9 Td
1.25 Tw
(In 1997, the HCFA issued a memorandum to an associate) Tj
-12 -12.5 Td
2.5 Tw
(regional administrator in HCFA Region IX) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(3) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( in response to) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
5 Tw
(Arizona's question whether non-emergency transportation) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
1.25 Tw
(provided to Indians was eligible for a FMAP reimbursement) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
1.2 Tw
(rate of 100 percent. The HCFA memo stated: ) Tj
22 -24.9 Td
.11 Tw
([W]e do not agree that non-emergency transportation) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
.96 Tw
(is a service provided ) Tj
(through an IHS facility.) Tj
( Our) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
.13 Tw
(position on this issue is that in order for IHS services) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
.81 Tw
(to qualify for 100% FMAP, the service must be: \(1\)) Tj
0 -12.5 Td
.37 Tw
(provided by IHS, or a contractual agent of an IHS or) Tj
0 -12.6 Td
1.34 Tw
(tribal facility, \(2\) considered as a ) Tj
(facility service) Tj
(;) Tj
0 -12.6 Td
2.74 Tw
(that is, a service that would be within the proper) Tj
0 -12.6 Td
.26 Tw
(scope of services which can be claimed by that facil-) Tj
0 -12.6 Td
1.17 Tw
(ity, and \(3\) claimed by the IHS facility as a service) Tj
0 -12.6 Td
0 Tw
(of that facility. These services are referred to in regu-) Tj
0 -12.6 Td
3.32 Tw
(lation at 42 CFR 440.10 \() Tj
(Inpatient hospital ser-) Tj
0 -12.6 Td
3.5 Tw
(vices\) and 42 CFR 440.20 \() Tj
(Outpatient hospital) Tj
0 -12.6 Td
1.2 Tw
(services and rural health facility services) Tj
(\)[.] ) Tj
0 -24.9 Td
.95 Tw
(For most facilities, services are furnished within the) Tj
0 -12.6 Td
2.5 Tw
(physical confines of the facility. Satellite facilities) Tj
0 -12.6 Td
1.18 Tw
(owned or leased, and operated by IHS or tribal 638) Tj
0 -12.6 Td
.21 Tw
(programs, are also considered to be within the physi-) Tj
0 -12.6 Td
1.42 Tw
(cal confines of an IHS/tribal facility.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(4) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Referred ser-) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
-12 -24.7 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.9 Tw
(3) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Currently, Region IX includes Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada,) Tj
-10 -10.7 Td
.53 Tw
(and the Territories of American Samoa, Guam and the Commonwealth of) Tj
0 -10.7 Td
1 Tw
(the Northern Mariana Islands. ) Tj
10 -13.4 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
2.18 Tw
(4) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Facilities owned or operated by tribes or tribal organizations under) Tj
-10 -10.7 Td
.18 Tw
(agreements with the IHS are known as ) Tj
(638) Tj
( facilities after the public law) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -432.95 m 300 -432.95 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15649) Tj
-207.5686 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
29 0 obj
4001
endobj
27 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 30 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 28 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 8 8
32 0 obj
<<
/Length 33 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
22 -8.4 Td
1.4 Tw
0 Tc
(vices, provided through a contractual arrangement,) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.22 Tw
(can also be considered provided ) Tj
(through an IHS) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.66 Tw
(facility and reimbursed at the 100% FMAP rate as) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.84 Tw
(long as these are services that could be provided as) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
4.16 Tw
(a ) Tj
(facility service) Tj
(, as referenced by regulation) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
3.58 Tw
(above. ) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Any other type of services, such as non-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.16 Tw
(emergency transportation, are not considered to be) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
3.61 Tw
(facility services) Tj
(, and therefore should be reim-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(bursed at the normal State/Federal match rate. ) Tj
-22 -26.4 Td
1.03 Tw
(Memorandum from the Acting Dir., Medicaid Bureau, to the) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.25 Tw
(Assoc. Reg'l Adm'r, Div. of Medicaid, Region IX \(May 15,) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(1997\) \(emphasis added\). ) Tj
12 -26.4 Td
3.33 Tw
(Arizona interpreted the memorandum's statement that a) Tj
-12 -13.3 Td
6.9 Tw
(FMAP reimbursement rate of 100 percent applied to) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.73 Tw
([r]eferred services, provided through a contractual arrange-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.77 Tw
(ment as extending to all health care services provided under) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.24 Tw
(referral agreements between IHS and non-IHS service provid-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.47 Tw
(ers. As a result of this interpretation, Arizona developed a) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2 Tw
(procedure for claiming a FMAP reimbursement rate of 100) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.07 Tw
(percent for services that met five criteria: \(1\) the recipient was) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.87 Tw
(a Medicaid-eligible Indian who had chosen IHS as his or her) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.33 Tw
(health plan as of the date of the service; \(2\) the service was) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.11 Tw
(provided by a non-IHS provider; \(3\) the service was furnished) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.7 Tw
(pursuant to an agreement between an IHS facility and the) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.13 Tw
(non-IHS provider at the time the service was provided; \(4\) the) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.14 Tw
(service was a ) Tj
(facility service,) Tj
( under 42 C.F.R. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.14 Tw
(440.10 or) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.5 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.5 Tw
(440.20;) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(5) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( and \(5\) the date of the service was on or after May) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.66 Tw
(15, 1997, the date of the non-emergency transportation mem-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(orandum. ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
0 -26.2 Td
.34 Tw
(number of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1 Tw
(1975, Pub. L. No. 93-638, 88 Stat. 2203. ) Tj
10 -14 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
2.87 Tw
(5) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(42 C.F.R. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
2.87 Tw
(440.10 \(defining ) Tj
(inpatient hospital services) Tj
(\) and 42) Tj
-10 -11.2 Td
1.97 Tw
(C.F.R. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.97 Tw
(440.20 \(defining ) Tj
(outpatient hospital services and rural health) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
.27 Tw
(clinic services) Tj
(\) identify services that are reimbursable through FMAP for) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1 Tw
(purposes of Medicaid. ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(42 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1 Tw
(1396d\(a\); 42 C.F.R. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1 Tw
(440.1.) Tj
( ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -418.85 m 300 -418.85 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15650) Tj
64.9314 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
33 0 obj
4075
endobj
31 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 30 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 32 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 9 9
35 0 obj
<<
/Length 36 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -8.4 Td
1.66 Tw
0 Tc
(Arizona made its first claim under the new procedure for) Tj
-12 -13.8 Td
.22 Tw
(the quarter ending March 31, 1999. As a result of its new pro-) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
.33 Tw
(cedure, Arizona claimed an additional $1,838 of federal reim-) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
7.61 Tw
(bursement, which HCFA allowed without deferral or) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
1.96 Tw
(investigation. However, in late 1999, HCFA began to defer) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
0 Tw
(action on Arizona's reimbursement claims, and ultimately dis-) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
5 Tw
(allowed Arizona's subsequent claims to the extent they) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
1.2 Tw
(exceeded the normal FMAP reimbursement rate. ) Tj
12 -27.3 Td
1.8 Tw
(Arizona appealed HCFA's disallowance of approximately) Tj
-12 -13.8 Td
1.61 Tw
($36 million of Arizona's claims. The Departmental Appeals) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
3.95 Tw
(Board \() Tj
(DAB) Tj
(\)) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(6) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( upheld HCFA's disallowance in a 2001) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
1.91 Tw
(administrative decision. In this decision, the DAB held that) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
2.08 Tw
(the meaning of ) Tj
(received through an Indian Health Service) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
2.12 Tw
(facility was ambiguous, because it could mean ) Tj
(by means) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
.12 Tw
(of or ) Tj
(in.) Tj
( Following its long-standing procedures for resolv-) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
3.14 Tw
(ing disputes over ambiguous statutory language, the DAB) Tj
0 -13.8 Td
1.2 Tw
(held: ) Tj
22 -27.3 Td
.34 Tw
(\(1\) HCFA's reasonable and long-standing interpreta-) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
1.36 Tw
(tion of the costs eligible for 100% FMAP was lim-) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
4.52 Tw
(ited to those `received through' an IHS facility) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
2.1 Tw
(which offers, is responsible for and bills Medicaid) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
0 Tw
(for the services provided; \(2\) Arizona was notified of) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
2 Tw
(and long operated consistently with this interpreta-) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
3.14 Tw
(tion; \(3\) HCFA did not change this policy in its) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.5 Tw
(memorandum of May 1997; \(4\) Arizona did not rea-) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.81 Tw
(sonably rely on an alternative interpretation; and \(5\)) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.5 Tw
(the costs disallowed here were not eligible for 100%) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
1.2 Tw
(FMAP rate under HCFA's interpretation. ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
-12 -27 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.89 Tw
(6) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(The DAB is a separate adjudicatory department within HHS that pro-) Tj
-10 -11.6 Td
.74 Tw
(vides independent review of disputed decisions for many HHS programs.) Tj
0 -11.6 Td
2.75 Tw
(The DAB generally issues HHS's final decision, which may then be) Tj
0 -11.6 Td
.05 Tw
(appealed to a federal court. Among its many functions, the DAB hears dis-) Tj
0 -11.6 Td
.95 Tw
(putes pertaining to HCFA's \(now CMS's\) disallowances of FMAP reim-) Tj
0 -11.6 Td
1 Tw
(bursement. ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(42 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1 Tw
(1316\(d\); 42 C.F.R. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1 Tw
(430.42\(b\). ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -419.25 m 300 -419.25 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15651) Tj
-207.5686 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
36 0 obj
3795
endobj
34 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 30 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 35 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 10 10
38 0 obj
<<
/Length 39 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
.91 Tw
0 Tc
(Accordingly, the DAB upheld all the disallowances at issue.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(7) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -28 Td
.41 Tw
(Arizona brought suit in the District of Arizona to challenge) Tj
-12 -14.1 Td
2.37 Tw
(the DAB's decision. Ruling on cross-motions for summary) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
.03 Tw
(judgment and applying the framework of ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron U.S.A., Inc.) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
2.82 Tw
(v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 467 U.S. 837) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
.67 Tw
(\(1984\), the district court ruled in favor of Arizona. Noting its) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
3.22 Tw
(agreement with the only two federal courts that had then) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
1.6 Tw
(addressed the issue, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(North Dakota ex rel. Olson v. Ctrs. for) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
1.11 Tw
(Medicare & Medicaid Servs.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 286 F. Supp. 2d 1080 \(D.N.D.) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
1.41 Tw
(2003\), ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(rev'd) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 403 F.3d 537 \(8th Cir. 2005\), and ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Ellenbecker) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
.27 Tw
(v. Ctrs. for Medicare & Medicaid Servs.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 335 F. Supp. 2d 999) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
1.46 Tw
(\(D.S.D. 2003\), ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(rev'd) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 403 F.3d 537 \(8th Cir. 2005\), the dis-) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
.97 Tw
(trict court reversed the DAB, concluding that ) Tj
(as a matter of) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
.49 Tw
(law . . . the language of [) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.49 Tw
(402\(e\)] at issue is clear and unam-) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
2.5 Tw
(biguous and . . . the phrase `received through' is properly) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
1.74 Tw
(interpreted as pertaining [to] services that are provided as a) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
.63 Tw
(result of a referral from an IHS facility by private health care) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
1.22 Tw
(providers who bill the state Medicaid program for those ser-) Tj
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -14.1 Td
.47 Tw
(vices.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(8) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( The district court determined that HCFA's interpreta-) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
3.55 Tw
(tion \(to which the DAB had deferred\) was unreasonable.) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
3.52 Tw
(Therefore, the district court granted Arizona's motion for) Tj
0 -14.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(summary judgment, which HCFA now appeals. ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -27.7 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.76 Tw
(7) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(The DAB subsequently issued a second decision that incorporated the) Tj
-10 -12 Td
1 Tw
(first decision and upheld the remaining disallowance.) Tj
( ) Tj
10 -14.9 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
3.94 Tw
(8) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(After the district court rendered its decision, the Eighth Circuit) Tj
-10 -11.9 Td
2.44 Tw
(reversed the decisions of the South Dakota and North Dakota district) Tj
0 -11.9 Td
1.15 Tw
(courts. ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(North Dakota ex rel. Olson v. CMS) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 403 F.3d 537, 540 \(8th Cir.) Tj
0 -11.9 Td
.3 Tw
(2005\). The Eighth Circuit ruled that the language of ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.3 Tw
(402\(e\) was unclear,) Tj
0 -11.9 Td
1.78 Tw
(but the legislative history ) Tj
(is clear and consistent) Tj
( and established that) Tj
0 -11.9 Td
1.67 Tw
(Congress's use of ) Tj
(received through) Tj
( rather than ) Tj
(provided in) Tj
( did not) Tj
0 -11.9 Td
.77 Tw
(cover services provided by non-IHS providers under a referral agreement) Tj
0 -11.9 Td
.33 Tw
(such as those at issue in this appeal. ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Id) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(. Therefore, the Eighth Circuit con-) Tj
0 -11.9 Td
1.1 Tw
(cluded that a FMAP reimbursement rate of 100 percent did not apply to) Tj
0 -11.9 Td
.95 Tw
(services provided by non-IHS health care providers under a referral con-) Tj
0 -11.9 Td
1 Tw
(tract with IHS. ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Id) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(. ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -330.95 m 300 -330.95 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15652) Tj
64.9314 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
4641
endobj
37 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 30 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 38 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 11 11
41 0 obj
<<
/Length 42 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
146.004 -8.4 Td
1.2 Tw
0 Tc
(II) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
-134.004 -26 Td
.03 Tw
([1]) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( We review the district court's grant of Arizona's motion) Tj
-12 -13 Td
1.84 Tw
(for summary judgment de novo. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Balint v. Carson City) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 180) Tj
0 -13 Td
.93 Tw
(F.3d 1047, 1050 \(9th Cir. 1999\). There is no dispute that the) Tj
0 -13 Td
2.91 Tw
(DAB's decision is the product of formal adjudication that) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.33 Tw
(merits ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( deference. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See United States v. Mead Corp.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(,) Tj
0 -13 Td
.58 Tw
(533 U.S. 218, 22627 \(2001\). Therefore, we follow a two-step) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.71 Tw
(process in reviewing the DAB's interpretation of federal law.) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.1 Td
.23 Tw
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 467 U.S. at 842-43. First, ) Tj
(if a court determines that) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.81 Tw
(Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue,) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.64 Tw
(then that is the end of the matter; for the court, as well as the) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.61 Tw
(agency, must give effect to the unambiguously expressed) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.5 Tw
(intent of Congress.) Tj
( ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(,) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.12 Tw
(526 U.S. 380, 392 \(1999\) \(internal citations and quotations) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.24 Tw
(omitted\). Second, if ) Tj
(the agency's statutory interpretation fills) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.71 Tw
(a gap or defines a term in a way that is reasonable in light of) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.03 Tw
(the legislature's revealed design, we give [that] judgment con-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.14 Tw
(trolling weight.) Tj
( ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Id.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( \(internal citations and quotations omit-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(ted\). ) Tj
145.668 -26 Td
(A) Tj
-133.668 -26 Td
1.03 Tw
(We begin with the plain language of the statute. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Gwaltney) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
1.11 Tw
(of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Found., Inc.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 484 U.S.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.6 Tw
(49, 56 \(1987\). The district court focused on the meaning of) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.18 Tw
(the word ) Tj
(through) Tj
( in the phrase ) Tj
(services which are received) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.87 Tw
(through an Indian Health Service facility,) Tj
( in ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.87 Tw
(402\(e\). The) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.27 Tw
(word ) Tj
(through) Tj
( is not defined elsewhere in the statute or by) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.95 Tw
(regulation. Accordingly, we consider whether there is an) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
5.37 Tw
(unambiguous common sense meaning of the word that) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.61 Tw
(resolves the question whether this phrase includes services) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1 Tw
(provided by non-IHS providers via a referral agreement with) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.75 Tw
(IHS, as Arizona would have it, or is limited to services ) Tj
(pro-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.33 Tw
(vided by a particular IHS facility within its scope of services) Tj
() Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.93 Tw
(and billed by that facility to Medicaid, as the DAB held. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.14 Tw
(Wilderness Soc'y ) Tj
(v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 353 F.3d) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.73 Tw
(1051, 1061 \(9th Cir. 2003\) \(en banc\) \(when no statutory or) Tj
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15653) Tj
-207.5686 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
42 0 obj
4084
endobj
40 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 30 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 41 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 12 12
44 0 obj
<<
/Length 45 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
1.33 Tw
0 Tc
(regulatory provision defines the meaning of a term, we con-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
3.28 Tw
(sider the common sense meaning of the words, including) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.25 Tw
(review of dictionaries\), ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(amended by) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( 360 F.3d 1374 \(9th Cir.) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(2004\) \(en banc\). ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -26.2 Td
2 Tw
([2]) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( After referring to dictionaries that were current when) Tj
-12 -13.2 Td
4.28 Tw
(Congress was drafting this legislation, we are unable to) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
3.14 Tw
(resolve this ambiguity. As noted by the DAB, the phrase) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
3.6 Tw
(through can mean ) Tj
(by means of) Tj
( and ) Tj
(by the help or) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
3.16 Tw
(agency of,) Tj
( Webster's Third New International Dictionary) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.61 Tw
(2384 \(1971\), which supports Arizona's interpretation, as well) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.28 Tw
(as ) Tj
(in) Tj
( and ) Tj
(within,) Tj
( which supports HCFA's interpretation.) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(Black's Law Dictionary 1652 \(4th ed. 1968\).) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(9) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
1.2 Tw
( ) Tj
12 -26.2 Td
.36 Tw
(In construing specific words in a statute, we must also look) Tj
-12 -13.2 Td
.14 Tw
(to the ) Tj
(language and design of the statute as a whole,) Tj
( ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(K Mart) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.48 Tw
(Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 486 U.S. 281, 291 \(1988\), and read the) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.39 Tw
(specific words ) Tj
(with a view to their place in the overall statu-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
2.03 Tw
(tory scheme.) Tj
( ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Wilderness Soc'y) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 353 F.3d at 1060 \(quoting) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.2 Td
3.25 Tw
(Davis v. Michigan Dep't of Treasury) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 489 U.S. 803, 809) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
4.67 Tw
(\(1989\)\). Arizona argues that because Congress used the) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
2.5 Tw
(phrases ) Tj
(provided in) Tj
( or ) Tj
(offered by) Tj
( in various Medicaid) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
4.85 Tw
(provisions, it intended the phrase ) Tj
(received through) Tj
( in) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
4.85 Tw
(402\(e\) to mean something different. For example, the) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.75 Tw
(IHCIA provides that states must be reimbursed under Medic-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
2 Tw
(aid for ) Tj
(services provided in [Indian Health] Service facili-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
2.47 Tw
(ties, IHCIA ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
2.47 Tw
(402\(a\), \(b\). In addition, various subsections) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.58 Tw
(within 42 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.58 Tw
(1396d restrict Medicaid coverage to ser-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.79 Tw
(vices that are provided ) Tj
(by) Tj
( or ) Tj
(in) Tj
( a facility. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See, e.g.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(,) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
( id.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.2 Td
6.25 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
6.25 Tw
(1396d\(a\)\(13\) \() Tj
(medical assistance) Tj
( includes physician-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
4.66 Tw
(recommended medical services ) Tj
(provided in a facility) Tj
(\);) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
3.2 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
3.2 Tw
(1396d\(a\)\(2\) \(medical assistance includes ambulatory ser-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.46 Tw
(vices ) Tj
(offered by a rural health clinic) Tj
(\); ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.46 Tw
(1396d\(t\)\(4\) \(cover-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.24 Tw
(ing laboratory services ) Tj
(customarily provided by or through,) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -26 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.58 Tw
(9) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Black's Law Dictionary is one source this court has used to determine) Tj
-10 -11.2 Td
.62 Tw
(the ) Tj
(common sense meaning) Tj
( of statutory language. ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(See, e.g.) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Wilderness) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1 Tw
(Soc'y) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 353 F.3d at 1061. ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -455.35 m 300 -455.35 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15654) Tj
64.9314 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
4658
endobj
43 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 30 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 44 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 13 13
47 0 obj
<<
/Length 48 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
3.66 Tw
0 Tc
(a general practitioner, family medicine physician, internal) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
5.17 Tw
(medicine physician, obstetrician/gynecologist, or pediatri-) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
.71 Tw
(cian\). Because a court must presume that Congress intended) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.52 Tw
(a different meaning when it uses different words in connec-) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.73 Tw
(tion with the same subject, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(see ) Tj
(SEC v. McCarthy,) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( 322 F.3d) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
2.5 Tw
(650, 656 \(9th Cir. 2003\), Arizona contends it is clear that) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
2.41 Tw
(Congress did not intend to limit the FMAP reimbursement) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.6 Tw
(rate of 100 percent to services provided in or offered by an) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.2 Tw
(IHS facility. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -26.6 Td
1.67 Tw
([3]) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( We agree that Congress has used a variety of expres-) Tj
-12 -13.5 Td
1.55 Tw
(sions to describe the relationship between Medicaid-covered) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.46 Tw
(medical services and the service provider, and has variously) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
3.16 Tw
(limited Medicaid coverage to services provided in, by, or) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.58 Tw
(through a particular type of provider. However, this conclu-) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
1.44 Tw
(sion does not explain what Congress meant by the language) Tj
0 -13.5 Td
2.58 Tw
(in ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
2.58 Tw
(402\(e\), providing a FMAP reimbursement rate of 100) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
.87 Tw
(percent for services ) Tj
(received through an IHS facility.) Tj
( Even) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
2 Tw
(if we agreed that Congress did not intend the FMAP reim-) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
4.33 Tw
(bursement rate of 100 percent to be limited to services) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
.81 Tw
(received by patients within the boundaries of an IHS facility,) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1.7 Tw
(we note that HCFA does not interpret ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.7 Tw
(402\(e\) as imposing) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
.25 Tw
(this limitation. Rather, the HCFA interpreted the FMAP reim-) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
2.41 Tw
(bursement rate of 100 percent as applying to services pro-) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1.3 Tw
(vided by certain non-IHS contractors so long as the services) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1.28 Tw
(are billed through the IHS facility. Despite Arizona's efforts) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1.67 Tw
(to distinguish ) Tj
(received through) Tj
( from other similar expres-) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1.53 Tw
(sions, Congress's use of the phrase ) Tj
(received through) Tj
( does) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
2.32 Tw
(not answer the question whether the FMAP reimbursement) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
.54 Tw
(rate of 100 percent applies to services provided by a non-IHS) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
2.08 Tw
(health services provider under a referral agreement with an) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
.63 Tw
(IHS facility. To this extent, we agree with the Eighth Circuit,) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
2.75 Tw
(that ) Tj
(even if `received through' has a broader connotation) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
4.14 Tw
(than `provided in,' the statute does not specify how far) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
.28 Tw
(`received through' should extend. Thus the statutory language) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
3.16 Tw
(is susceptible to multiple interpretations and does little to) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1 Tw
(resolve the present controversy.) Tj
( ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(North Dakota ex rel. Olson) Tj
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15655) Tj
-207.5686 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
48 0 obj
3935
endobj
46 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 49 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 47 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 14 14
51 0 obj
<<
/Length 52 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
1.26 Tw
0 Tc
(v. Ctrs. for Medicare & Medicaid Servs.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 403 F.3d 537, 540) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(\(8th Cir. 2005\). ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -26.3 Td
.12 Tw
([4]) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( Moreover, reading ) Tj
(received through an IHS facility) Tj
( in) Tj
-12 -13.3 Td
3.24 Tw
(the context of the IHCIA as a whole weighs in favor of) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.94 Tw
(HCFA's more limited interpretation. HCFA argues that Con-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.92 Tw
(gress linked the FMAP reimbursement rate of 100 percent to) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
2.14 Tw
(IHS facilities and their services, rather than to other health) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.27 Tw
(service providers. In other words, the purpose of Title IV of) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.33 Tw
(the IHCIA was to benefit IHS facilities by enabling them to) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.37 Tw
(receive Medicaid reimbursement, which must be placed in a) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.63 Tw
(special fund and used ) Tj
(exclusively for the purpose of making) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.41 Tw
(any improvements in the facilities of such Service which may) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.08 Tw
(be necessary to achieve compliance with the applicable condi-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.88 Tw
(tions and requirements of [Title XIX of the Social Security) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.71 Tw
(Act]. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( IHCIA ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.71 Tw
(402\(c\), 25 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.71 Tw
(1642\(a\). Therefore,) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
2.21 Tw
(the statutory structure better supports interpreting ) Tj
(received) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.85 Tw
(through an IHS facility) Tj
( to ensure that the FMAP reimburse-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.66 Tw
(ment benefits the IHS facility. Interpreting ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.66 Tw
(402\(e\) as apply-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
2.92 Tw
(ing the FMAP reimbursement rate of 100 percent only to) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.33 Tw
(services paid for \(and billed to Medicaid by\) IHS furthers this) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.42 Tw
(goal better than the more expansive Arizona interpretation.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(10) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
145.998 -26.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(B) Tj
-133.998 -26.2 Td
1.1 Tw
(At the next step in the ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( analysis, the parties argue) Tj
-12 -13.2 Td
1.33 Tw
(that any ambiguity in ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.33 Tw
(402\(e\) is clarified by legislative his-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.14 Tw
(tory. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
(United States v. Daas) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 198 F.3d 1167, 1174 \(9th Cir.) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -26 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.5 Tw
(10) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(HCFA also argues that ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Alaska Department of Health & Social Ser-) Tj
-10 -11.2 Td
.09 Tw
(vices v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 424 F.3d 931 \(9th Cir.) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
.47 Tw
(2005\), defined the word ) Tj
(through) Tj
( when it characterized the FMAP reim-) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
.28 Tw
(bursement rate of 100 percent as applying to ) Tj
(state expenditures on behalf) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1.16 Tw
(of eligible Native Americans ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(at) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
( IHS facilities.) Tj
( ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Id. ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(at 935 n.1 \(emphasis) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
2.43 Tw
(added\). However, this footnote merely provides background about the) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1.78 Tw
(funding of IHS facilities, and does not purport to address the scope of) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1.69 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.69 Tw
(402\(e\). When ) Tj
(a statement is made casually and without analysis,) Tj
( it) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1.08 Tw
(does not constitute a precedential decision of this court on an undecided) Tj
0 -11.2 Td
1 Tw
(issue. ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(United States v. Johnson) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(, 256 F.3d 895, 915 \(9th Cir. 2001\). ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -376.95 m 300 -376.95 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15656) Tj
64.9314 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
52 0 obj
4584
endobj
50 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 49 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 51 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 15 15
54 0 obj
<<
/Length 55 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
.11 Tw
0 Tc
(1999\). We disagree, and part company with the Eighth Circuit) Tj
0 -13 Td
.93 Tw
(in its conclusion to that effect. HCFA argues, and the Eighth) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.47 Tw
(Circuit held, that Congress intended ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.47 Tw
(402\(e\)'s FMAP reim-) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.33 Tw
(bursement rate of 100 percent to apply only to services pro-) Tj
0 -13 Td
0 Tw
(vided ) Tj
(in) Tj
( a facility, because various congressional committee) Tj
0 -13 Td
2.11 Tw
(reports described that rate as being limited to services pro-) Tj
0 -13 Td
.57 Tw
(vided ) Tj
(in) Tj
( IHS facilities. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(H.R. Rep. No. 94-1026, pt. I, at) Tj
0 -13 Td
3.65 Tw
(108, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(reprinted in) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2652, 2746 \(FMAP) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.58 Tw
(reimbursement rate of 100 percent ) Tj
(for services provided to) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.25 Tw
(any Indian in an IHS facility) Tj
(\); ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(id.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, pt. III, at 7, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(reprinted in) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.1 Td
.28 Tw
(1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2652, 2782 \() Tj
(services provided to Indians) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
4.3 Tw
(in IHS facilities) Tj
(\); ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(id.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, pt. III, at 21, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(reprinted in) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( 1976) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.67 Tw
(U.S.C.C.A.N. 2652, 2796 \() Tj
(Indians receiving services in IHS) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.95 Tw
(facilities) Tj
(\). However, the change in terminology from com-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.55 Tw
(mittee reports to Congressional enactment equally supports) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.71 Tw
(the opposite conclusion, namely, that in enacting ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
2.71 Tw
(402\(e\),) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2 Tw
(Congress decided not to use the narrower phrase ) Tj
(provided) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.11 Tw
(in. Instead, Congress opted for a broader scope of reimburse-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.84 Tw
(ment when it chose to use the phrase ) Tj
(received through,) Tj
( the) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(words that actually appear in the statute. ) Tj
12 -26 Td
.33 Tw
(Arizona relies on legislative history and the structure of the) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
.41 Tw
(IHCIA to argue that Congress intended the FMAP reimburse-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.18 Tw
(ment rate of 100 percent to apply to all referred services. Title) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.52 Tw
(V of the IHCIA specifically addresses the health care needs) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.97 Tw
(of urban Indians, who do not live on reservations and do not) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.24 Tw
(necessarily rely on the IHS system for health care. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(IHCIA) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.94 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.94 Tw
(501-08, 25 U.S.C. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.94 Tw
(1651-58. Arizona points to commit-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.33 Tw
(tee report language indicating that Congress intended Title IV) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.14 Tw
(of IHCIA \(which includes the statutory language at issue\) to) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.5 Tw
(focus on the plight of Indians who do live on or near reserva-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.73 Tw
(tions, and primarily rely on the IHS system for health care.) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.1 Td
2.2 Tw
(See, e.g.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, H.R. Rep. No. 94-1026, pt. I, at 1618, 107, 114,) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.1 Td
1.47 Tw
(reprinted in) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2652, 2655-57, 2745, 2752.) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.33 Tw
(Arizona argues that because improving the health status of) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.12 Tw
(reservation Indians was the principal concern of Title IV,) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.66 Tw
(Congress intended the FMAP reimbursement rate of 100 per-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.16 Tw
(cent to apply to all services provided in the IHS system,) Tj
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15657) Tj
-207.5686 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
55 0 obj
4456
endobj
53 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 49 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 54 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 16 16
57 0 obj
<<
/Length 58 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
2.71 Tw
0 Tc
(including all referred services. By contrast, health services) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
.72 Tw
(outside of the IHS system, such as those used by some urban) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
2.28 Tw
(Indians, would not be subject to the FMAP reimbursement) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
.92 Tw
(rate of 100 percent. According to Arizona, ) Tj
(Congress's deci-) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
.9 Tw
(sion . . . thus reflected a well understood distinction between) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
.8 Tw
(these two groups of Native Americans at the time the IHCIA) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(was enacted.) Tj
( ) Tj
12 -24.3 Td
1.83 Tw
(We are not persuaded. First, the statutory sections within) Tj
-12 -12.2 Td
1.14 Tw
(Title IV do not distinguish between urban Indians and reser-) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
.66 Tw
(vation Indians. Also, the legislative history does not establish) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
.5 Tw
(that Congress sought to assist reservation Indians by ensuring) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
1.36 Tw
(a FMAP reimbursement rate of 100 percent for the broadest) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
.84 Tw
(possible range of IHS health care services, such as those res-) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
.83 Tw
(ervation Indians receive from a non-IHS health care provider) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
2.5 Tw
(with a referral agreement. Finally, the higher FMAP reim-) Tj
0 -12.2 Td
.74 Tw
(bursement rate does not assist Indians, whether living on res-) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
2.22 Tw
(ervations or in cities; rather, it merely adjusts the financial) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
2.5 Tw
(responsibility for health care between the state and federal) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
2.1 Tw
(fiscs. Neither the distinction between reservation and urban) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
.21 Tw
(Indians, nor Arizona's purported principal purpose of Title IV) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(resolve the ambiguity in ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(402\(e\). ) Tj
12 -24.3 Td
1.58 Tw
(The parties also reach opposite conclusions based on lan-) Tj
-12 -12.3 Td
1.22 Tw
(guage in a House Report indicating that the ) Tj
(Committee [on) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
2 Tw
(Interior and Insular Affairs] took the view that it would be) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
2.33 Tw
(unfair and inequitable to burden a State Medicaid program) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
.52 Tw
(with costs which normally would have been borne by [IHS].) Tj
() Tj
0 -12.3 Td
3.73 Tw
(H.R. Rep. No. 94-1026, pt. I, at 108, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(reprinted in) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( 1976) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
2.51 Tw
(U.S.C.C.A.N. 2652, 2746. The House Report suggests that) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
1.18 Tw
(Congress included ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.18 Tw
(402\(e\) in order to eliminate such a bur-) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(den. ) Tj
12 -24.3 Td
2.18 Tw
(Both parties draw support from this legislative language.) Tj
-12 -12.3 Td
.41 Tw
(The HCFA argues that in light of the payor of last resort rule,) Tj
0 -12.3 Td
1.25 Tw
(which has been in place since 1956,) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(11) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( the Medicaid program) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -24.2 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.9 Tw
(11) Tj
0 Ts
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(See ) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(55 Fed. Reg. 4606, 4608 \(Feb. 9, 1990\). The rule is currently) Tj
-10 -10.4 Td
1.31 Tw
(located at 42 C.F.R. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.31 Tw
(136.61. Under the ) Tj
(payor of last resort) Tj
( rule, the) Tj
0 -10.4 Td
.7 Tw
(IHS does not pay if there is another source of health care funds available) Tj
0 -10.4 Td
1 Tw
(such as Medicaid. 42 C.F.R. ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1 Tw
(136.61.) Tj
( ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -447.55 m 300 -447.55 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15658) Tj
64.9314 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
58 0 obj
4201
endobj
56 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 49 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 57 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 17 17
60 0 obj
<<
/Length 61 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
2.41 Tw
0 Tc
(would have been responsible for the costs of services pro-) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.47 Tw
(vided by non-IHS providers to any Medicaid-eligible Indians.) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
1.18 Tw
(Because the standard FMAP reimbursement rate would have) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
2.78 Tw
(applied to such costs before Congress enacted the IHCIA,) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.73 Tw
(HCFA argues that its interpretation of ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.73 Tw
(402\(e\) does not shift) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.51 Tw
(any costs previously borne by the IHS to state governments.) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
(12) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -27.2 Td
1.07 Tw
(Arizona, on the other hand, argues that as a practical mat-) Tj
-12 -13.7 Td
.44 Tw
(ter, IHS generally paid for services provided by non-IHS pro-) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
3.87 Tw
(viders under its various agreements with IHS. The same) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
4.66 Tw
(House Report mentions the Senate Finance Committee's) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.16 Tw
(acknowledgment that ) Tj
(with respect to matters relating to Indi-) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.75 Tw
(ans, the Federal Government has traditionally assumed major) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
0 Tw
(responsibility.) Tj
( H.R. Rep. No. 94-1026, pt. I, at 108, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(reprinted) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
1.71 Tw
(in) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2652, 2746; ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(see also ) Tj
(id.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, pt. I, at 14,) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.7 Td
.9 Tw
(reprinted in) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2652, 2653-54. Arizona also) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
3.55 Tw
(relies on language indicating that many otherwise-eligible) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
1.74 Tw
(Indians did not enroll or participate in Medicaid because of) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.96 Tw
(geographical constraints and reliance on IHS health care, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(id.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(,) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.69 Tw
(pt. I, at 107, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(reprinted in) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2652, 2745, but) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.63 Tw
(the report states that predicting this number would be ) Tj
(nearly) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.66 Tw
(impossible.) Tj
( ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Id.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, pt. I., at 26, ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(reprinted in) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N.) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
1.2 Tw
(2652, 2665-66. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -27.1 Td
2.17 Tw
([5]) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( Based on our review of the record, neither party has) Tj
-12 -13.7 Td
.4 Tw
(established whether the state or the IHS paid for services pro-) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.34 Tw
(vided by non-IHS service providers under referral agreements) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
1.62 Tw
(before Congress passed the IHCIA. Nor does the legislative) Tj
0 -13.7 Td
.63 Tw
(history suggest that in 1976, Congress knew that the IHS had) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
2.45 Tw
(this burden, and thus intended for a FMAP reimbursement) Tj
0 -13.6 Td
3.23 Tw
(rate of 100 percent to apply to such expenditures. In the) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -26.9 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.62 Tw
(12) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Arizona argues that HCFA's burden-shifting argument is not applica-) Tj
-10 -11.6 Td
.23 Tw
(ble to Arizona because it was the only state not a member of the Medicaid) Tj
0 -11.6 Td
.53 Tw
(program in 1976 when the IHCIA was enacted. However, for purposes of) Tj
0 -11.6 Td
1.17 Tw
(interpreting the meaning of a generally applicable federal statute, Arizo-) Tj
0 -11.6 Td
1 Tw
(na's specific status under Medicaid is irrelevant. ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -430.85 m 300 -430.85 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15659) Tj
-207.5686 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
61 0 obj
4243
endobj
59 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 49 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 60 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 18 18
63 0 obj
<<
/Length 64 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
.03 Tw
0 Tc
(absence of such evidence, the legislative history is of no assis-) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1.2 Tw
(tance in clarifying the meaning of ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.2 Tw
(402\(e\).) Tj
4.9 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
.5 Tw
(13) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
145.998 -26.5 Td
1.2 Tw
(C) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
-133.998 -26.5 Td
.3 Tw
([6]) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( Because the statutory language is ambiguous, and is not) Tj
-12 -13.4 Td
1.97 Tw
(clarified by the usual interpretive aids, we must turn to the) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1.03 Tw
(DAB's interpretation of ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.03 Tw
(402\(e\) and determine whether it is) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
.33 Tw
(based on a ) Tj
(permissible construction of the statute.) Tj
( ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(,) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
0 Tw
(467 U.S. at 843. If a statute's language can reasonably be con-) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1.27 Tw
(strued in more than one way, a court ) Tj
(may not substitute its) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
1.08 Tw
(own construction) Tj
( of the statute ) Tj
(for a reasonable interpreta-) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
3.36 Tw
(tion made by) Tj
( the agency that Congress has entrusted to) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
.47 Tw
(implement the legislation) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(. United Food & Commercial Work-) Tj
0 -13.4 Td
.99 Tw
(ers Union v. NLRB, Local 1036) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 307 F.3d 760, 767 \(9th Cir.) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.07 Tw
(2002\) \(en banc\) \(quoting ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 467 U.S. at 844\). An agen-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.27 Tw
(cy's interpretation of a statute is permissible unless it is ) Tj
(arbi-) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
5.24 Tw
(trary, capricious, or manifestly contrary to the statute.) Tj
() Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -13.3 Td
1.2 Tw
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 467 U.S. at 844. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -26.4 Td
5.24 Tw
([7]) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( Here, the DAB interpreted ) Tj
(received through) Tj
( in) Tj
-12 -13.3 Td
.83 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.83 Tw
(402\(e\) by deferring to HCFA's long-standing interpretation) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.73 Tw
(that the costs eligible for a FMAP reimbursement rate of 100) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
3.33 Tw
(percent were ) Tj
(limited to those `received through' an IHS) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
.52 Tw
(facility which offers, is responsible for and bills Medicaid for) Tj
0 -13.3 Td
1.32 Tw
(the services provided.) Tj
( This interpretation is not ) Tj
(manifestly) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
10 -26.2 Td
4.1 Ts
/F5 6 Tf 100 Tz
1.15 Tw
(13) Tj
0 Ts
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(Arizona also asks us to consider a bill introduced in 1973 but never) Tj
-10 -11.3 Td
1.25 Tw
(enacted, which provided that states were entitled to a FMAP reimburse-) Tj
0 -11.3 Td
.22 Tw
(ment rate of 100 percent for medical costs of individuals ) Tj
(who . . . resided) Tj
0 -11.3 Td
1.91 Tw
(on or adjacent to a Federal Indian reservation.) Tj
( H.R. 3153, 93d Cong.) Tj
0 -11.3 Td
.67 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.67 Tw
(174\(a\), 119 Cong. Rec. 38350, 38367 \(1973\). Arizona argues that Con-) Tj
0 -11.3 Td
1.47 Tw
(gress intended the ) Tj
(received through) Tj
( language in ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
1.47 Tw
(402\(e\) to mean the) Tj
0 -11.3 Td
.25 Tw
(same thing as ) Tj
(on or adjacent to.) Tj
( The Supreme Court has considered pre-) Tj
0 -11.3 Td
.48 Tw
(decessor bills when the operative language of the original bill was carried) Tj
0 -11.3 Td
2.72 Tw
(forward into the enacted legislation and the legislative history of the) Tj
0 -11.3 Td
.5 Tw
(enacted legislation referred to the older bill. ) Tj
/F4 10 Tf 100 Tz
(See United States v. Enmons) Tj
/F2 10 Tf 100 Tz
(,) Tj
0 -11.3 Td
.53 Tw
(410 U.S. 396, 405 n.14 \(1973\). In this case, however, the enacted legisla-) Tj
0 -11.3 Td
1 Tw
(tion makes no reference to the 1973 bill, which thus is irrelevant. ) Tj
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 cm
0 G
.5 w 0 -353.35 m 300 -353.35 l s
Q
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15660) Tj
64.9314 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
64 0 obj
4586
endobj
62 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 49 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
/F5 17 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 63 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 19 19
66 0 obj
<<
/Length 67 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
0 -8.4 Td
.73 Tw
0 Tc
(contrary) Tj
( to ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.73 Tw
(402\(e\), ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 467 U.S. at 844, but rather is) Tj
0 -13 Td
4 Tw
(consistent with the statutory language. Under the DAB's) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.52 Tw
(interpretation, the FMAP reimbursement rate of 100 percent) Tj
0 -13 Td
.26 Tw
(is not limited to costs incurred solely within the boundaries of) Tj
0 -13 Td
1.37 Tw
(an IHS facility, but would cover the costs for some services) Tj
0 -13 Td
(received at a non-IHS facility, in those cases where the IHS) Tj
0 -13 Td
.17 Tw
(has taken responsibility for providing that service to its Indian) Tj
0 -13 Td
.3 Tw
(patient and actually bills Medicaid for that service. This inter-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.88 Tw
(pretation is consistent with and gives effect to the statutory) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.32 Tw
(language used by Congress. Moreover, HCFA adopted this) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.21 Tw
(interpretation contemporaneously with the enactment of the) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.72 Tw
(IHCIA, and has adhered to it for over 20 years. We should) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.15 Tw
(normally accord particular deference to an agency interpreta-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3.42 Tw
(tion of `longstanding' duration.) Tj
( ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Barnhart v. Walton) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 535) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.16 Tw
(U.S. 212, 220 \(2002\). Because the DAB's interpretation of) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.71 Tw
() Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.71 Tw
(402\(e\) is not arbitrary, capricious, or manifestly contrary to) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(the statute, we must defer to it. ) Tj
12 -26 Td
1.47 Tw
(Arizona argues that the DAB's interpretation is unreason-) Tj
-12 -13.1 Td
1.66 Tw
(able both because it conflicts with HCFA's 1997 memoran-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.78 Tw
(dum and because it is bad policy. HCFA argues that its 1997) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.76 Tw
(memorandum is consistent with its long-standing interpreta-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.81 Tw
(tion of ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.81 Tw
(402\(e\) and is good policy. We need not resolve this) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.47 Tw
(dispute, because ) Tj
([i]nterpretations such as those in opinion) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.51 Tw
(letters like interpretations contained in policy statements,) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
3 Tw
(agency manuals, and enforcement guidelines, all of which) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.07 Tw
(lack the force of law do not warrant ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(-style defer-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
4 Tw
(ence. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(Christensen v. Harris County) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 529 U.S. 576, 587) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.75 Tw
(\(2000\); ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
(see also City of Los Angeles v. U.S. Dep't of Com-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.56 Tw
(merce) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 307 F.3d 859, 874 \(9th Cir. 2002\). Nor should we) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.2 Tw
(make policy decisions for the agency: ) Tj
22 -26 Td
2.83 Tw
(When a challenge to an agency construction of a) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.34 Tw
(statutory provision, fairly conceptualized, really cen-) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.71 Tw
(ters on the wisdom of the agency's policy, rather) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
1.52 Tw
(than whether it is a reasonable choice within a gap) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
2.5 Tw
(left open by Congress, the challenge must fail. In) Tj
0 -13.1 Td
.44 Tw
(such a case, federal judges who have no constitu-) Tj
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
428.5 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15661) Tj
-207.5686 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
67 0 obj
3989
endobj
65 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 68 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 66 0 R
>>
endobj
%%Page: 20 20
70 0 obj
<<
/Length 71 0 R
>>
stream
q
BT
0 Tr
0 g
1 0 0 1 156 643.5 Tm
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
22 -8.4 Td
3.33 Tw
0 Tc
(ency have a duty to respect legitimate policy) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(choices made by those who do. ) Tj
/F4 12 Tf 100 Tz
-22 -26.2 Td
(Chevron) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(, 467 U.S. at 866. ) Tj
144.006 -26.2 Td
(III) Tj
-132.006 -26.2 Td
.78 Tw
(The DAB's interpretation of ) Tj
0 Tw
( ) Tj
.78 Tw
(402\(e\) is a permissible con-) Tj
-12 -13.2 Td
1.55 Tw
(struction of an ambiguous statute. We therefore defer to the) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.4 Tw
(DAB's interpretation that the costs eligible for a FMAP reim-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.93 Tw
(bursement rate of 100 percent are ) Tj
(limited to those `received) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.41 Tw
(through' an IHS facility which offers, is responsible for and) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.87 Tw
(bills Medicaid for the services provided.) Tj
( The district court) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
2 Tw
(erred in interpreting the phrase ) Tj
(received through) Tj
( to mean) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
2.74 Tw
(pertaining [to] services that are provided as a result of a) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.07 Tw
(referral from an IHS facility by private health care providers) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.18 Tw
(who bill the state Medicaid program for those services.) Tj
( We) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
.08 Tw
(therefore reverse the district court's grant of Arizona's motion) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.81 Tw
(for summary judgment, and remand for proceedings consis-) Tj
0 -13.2 Td
1.2 Tw
(tent with this ruling. ) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
12 -26.2 Td
(REVERSED ) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
(and) Tj
/F1 12 Tf 100 Tz
( REMANDED.) Tj
/F2 12 Tf 100 Tz
( ) Tj
1 0 0 1 0 792 Tm
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
156 -136.5 Td
1.1 Tw
0 Tc
(15662) Tj
64.9314 0 Td
(A) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(RIZONA) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( H) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(EALTH) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(ARE) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
( v. M) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
1.1 Tw
(C) Tj
/F2 7.7 Tf 101.2 Tz
.79 Tw
(LELLAN) Tj
/F2 11 Tf 100 Tz
0 Ts
ET
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 792 cm
0 G
.5 w 156 -140.25 m 456 -140.25 l s
Q
endstream
endobj
71 0 obj
2186
endobj
69 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/Parent 68 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F1 6 0 R
/F2 7 0 R
/F4 9 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 1 0 R
>>
/Contents 70 0 R
>>
endobj
1 0 obj
[ /PDF /Text ]
endobj
72 0 obj
<<
/Type /Encoding
/Differences [ 219 /Zcaron 135 /ccedilla 152 /ydieresis 243 /atilde 140 /icircumflex
31 /threesuperior 136 /ecircumflex 146 /thorn 138 /egrave 30 /twosuperior 130 /eacute
254 /otilde 155 /Aacute 147 /ocircumflex 217 /yacute 129 /udieresis 247 /threequarters
131 /acircumflex 190 /Eth 137 /edieresis 151 /ugrave 223 /trademark 149 /ograve 215 /scaron
228 /Idieresis 218 /uacute 133 /agrave 210 /ntilde 134 /aring 220 /zcaron 226 /Icircumflex
209 /Ntilde 150 /ucircumflex 159 /Ecircumflex 224 /Iacute 128 /Ccedilla 153 /Odieresis
214 /Scaron 176 /Edieresis 229 /Igrave 132 /adieresis 236 /Ograve 181 /Egrave 242 /Ydieresis
221 /registered 237 /Otilde 244 /onequarter 240 /Ugrave 239 /Ucircumflex 145 /Thorn
25 /divide 158 /Atilde 238 /Uacute 231 /Ocircumflex 29 /logicalnot 143 /Aring 139 /idieresis
252 /iacute 160 /aacute 27 /plusminus 26 /multiply 154 /Udieresis 28 /minus 204 /onesuperior
144 /Eacute 156 /Acircumflex 222 /copyright 157 /Agrave 148 /odieresis 253 /oacute 127 /degree
141 /igrave 201 /mu 230 /Oacute 192 /eth 142 /Adieresis 216 /Yacute 255 /brokenbar 246 /onehalf
]
>>
endobj
73 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Times-Bold
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -168 -218 1000 935 ]
/MissingWidth 250
/StemV 139.00
/StemH 69.50
/ItalicAngle 0.00
/CapHeight 676
/XHeight 461
/Ascent 676
/Descent -205
/Leading 0
/MaxWidth 0
/AvgWidth 0
>>
endobj
6 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /Type1
/Name /F1
/BaseFont /Times-Bold
/FirstChar 0
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 570 570 570 570 570 300 300
250 333 555 500 500 1000 833 333 333 333 500 570 250 333 250 278
500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 333 333 570 570 570 500
930 722 667 722 722 667 611 778 778 389 500 778 667 944 722 778
611 778 722 556 667 722 722 1000 722 722 667 333 278 333 581 500
333 500 556 444 556 444 333 500 556 278 333 556 278 833 556 500
556 556 444 389 333 556 500 722 500 500 444 394 220 394 520 400
722 556 444 500 500 500 500 444 444 444 444 278 278 278 722 722
667 611 556 500 500 500 556 556 500 778 722 722 722 722 722 667
500 333 500 500 167 500 500 500 500 278 500 500 333 333 556 556
667 500 500 500 250 667 540 350 333 500 500 500 1000 1000 722 500
500 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 556 333 333 300 333 333 333
1000 722 556 250 250 250 556 389 722 500 556 667 444 747 747 1000
389 1000 389 300 389 389 778 778 667 778 1000 330 778 778 722 722
722 722 722 500 750 278 750 750 278 500 722 556 278 500 500 220 ]
/Encoding 72 0 R
/FontDescriptor 73 0 R
>>
endobj
74 0 obj
<<
/Type /Encoding
/Differences [ 219 /Zcaron 135 /ccedilla 152 /ydieresis 243 /atilde 140 /icircumflex
31 /threesuperior 136 /ecircumflex 146 /thorn 138 /egrave 30 /twosuperior 130 /eacute
254 /otilde 155 /Aacute 147 /ocircumflex 217 /yacute 129 /udieresis 247 /threequarters
131 /acircumflex 190 /Eth 137 /edieresis 151 /ugrave 223 /trademark 149 /ograve 215 /scaron
228 /Idieresis 218 /uacute 133 /agrave 210 /ntilde 134 /aring 220 /zcaron 226 /Icircumflex
209 /Ntilde 150 /ucircumflex 159 /Ecircumflex 224 /Iacute 128 /Ccedilla 153 /Odieresis
214 /Scaron 176 /Edieresis 229 /Igrave 132 /adieresis 236 /Ograve 181 /Egrave 242 /Ydieresis
221 /registered 237 /Otilde 244 /onequarter 240 /Ugrave 239 /Ucircumflex 145 /Thorn
25 /divide 158 /Atilde 238 /Uacute 231 /Ocircumflex 29 /logicalnot 143 /Aring 139 /idieresis
252 /iacute 160 /aacute 27 /plusminus 26 /multiply 154 /Udieresis 28 /minus 204 /onesuperior
144 /Eacute 156 /Acircumflex 222 /copyright 157 /Agrave 148 /odieresis 253 /oacute 127 /degree
141 /igrave 201 /mu 230 /Oacute 192 /eth 142 /Adieresis 216 /Yacute 255 /brokenbar 246 /onehalf
]
>>
endobj
75 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Times-Roman
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -168 -218 1000 898 ]
/MissingWidth 250
/StemV 84.00
/StemH 42.00
/ItalicAngle 0.00
/CapHeight 662
/XHeight 450
/Ascent 683
/Descent -217
/Leading 0
/MaxWidth 0
/AvgWidth 0
>>
endobj
7 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /Type1
/Name /F2
/BaseFont /Times-Roman
/FirstChar 0
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 564 564 564 564 564 300 300
250 333 408 500 500 833 778 333 333 333 500 564 250 333 250 278
500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 278 278 564 564 564 444
921 722 667 667 722 611 556 722 722 333 389 722 611 889 722 722
556 722 667 556 611 722 722 944 722 722 611 333 278 333 469 500
333 444 500 444 500 444 333 500 500 278 278 500 278 778 500 500
500 500 333 389 278 500 500 722 500 500 444 480 200 480 541 400
667 500 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 278 278 278 722 722
611 556 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 722 722 722 722 722 722 611
444 333 500 500 167 500 500 500 500 180 444 500 333 333 556 556
611 500 500 500 250 611 453 350 333 444 444 500 1000 1000 722 444
500 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 500 333 333 300 333 333 333
1000 722 500 250 250 250 556 389 722 500 500 611 444 760 760 980
333 889 333 276 333 333 722 722 611 722 889 310 722 722 722 722
722 667 722 444 750 278 750 750 278 500 722 500 278 500 500 200 ]
/Encoding 74 0 R
/FontDescriptor 75 0 R
>>
endobj
76 0 obj
<<
/Type /Encoding
/Differences [ 240 /apple ]
>>
endobj
77 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Symbol
/Flags 4
/FontBBox [ -180 -293 1090 1010 ]
/MissingWidth 250
/StemV 85.00
/StemH 42.50
/ItalicAngle 0.00
/CapHeight 0
/XHeight 0
/Ascent 0
/Descent 0
/Leading 0
/MaxWidth 0
/AvgWidth 0
>>
endobj
8 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /Type1
/Name /F3
/BaseFont /Symbol
/FirstChar 0
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 333 713 500 549 833 778 439 333 333 500 549 250 549 250 278
500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 278 278 549 549 549 444
549 722 667 722 612 611 763 603 722 333 631 722 686 889 722 722
768 741 556 592 611 690 439 768 645 795 611 333 863 333 658 500
500 631 549 549 494 439 521 411 603 329 603 549 549 576 521 549
549 521 549 603 439 576 713 686 493 686 494 480 200 480 549 250
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 620 247 549 167 713 500 753 753 753 753 1042 987 603 987 603
400 549 411 549 549 713 494 460 549 549 549 549 1000 603 1000 658
823 686 795 987 768 768 823 768 768 713 713 713 713 713 713 713
768 713 790 250 250 250 549 250 713 603 603 1042 987 603 987 603
494 329 790 790 786 713 384 384 384 384 384 384 494 494 494 494
790 329 274 686 686 686 384 384 384 384 384 384 494 494 494 250 ]
/Encoding 76 0 R
/FontDescriptor 77 0 R
>>
endobj
78 0 obj
<<
/Type /Encoding
/Differences [ 219 /Zcaron 135 /ccedilla 152 /ydieresis 243 /atilde 140 /icircumflex
31 /threesuperior 136 /ecircumflex 146 /thorn 138 /egrave 30 /twosuperior 130 /eacute
254 /otilde 155 /Aacute 147 /ocircumflex 217 /yacute 129 /udieresis 247 /threequarters
131 /acircumflex 190 /Eth 137 /edieresis 151 /ugrave 223 /trademark 149 /ograve 215 /scaron
228 /Idieresis 218 /uacute 133 /agrave 210 /ntilde 134 /aring 220 /zcaron 226 /Icircumflex
209 /Ntilde 150 /ucircumflex 159 /Ecircumflex 224 /Iacute 128 /Ccedilla 153 /Odieresis
214 /Scaron 176 /Edieresis 229 /Igrave 132 /adieresis 236 /Ograve 181 /Egrave 242 /Ydieresis
221 /registered 237 /Otilde 244 /onequarter 240 /Ugrave 239 /Ucircumflex 145 /Thorn
25 /divide 158 /Atilde 238 /Uacute 231 /Ocircumflex 29 /logicalnot 143 /Aring 139 /idieresis
252 /iacute 160 /aacute 27 /plusminus 26 /multiply 154 /Udieresis 28 /minus 204 /onesuperior
144 /Eacute 156 /Acircumflex 222 /copyright 157 /Agrave 148 /odieresis 253 /oacute 127 /degree
141 /igrave 201 /mu 230 /Oacute 192 /eth 142 /Adieresis 216 /Yacute 255 /brokenbar 246 /onehalf
]
>>
endobj
79 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Times-Italic
/Flags 98
/FontBBox [ -169 -217 1010 883 ]
/MissingWidth 250
/StemV 76.00
/StemH 38.00
/ItalicAngle -15.50
/CapHeight 653
/XHeight 441
/Ascent 683
/Descent -205
/Leading 0
/MaxWidth 0
/AvgWidth 0
>>
endobj
9 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /Type1
/Name /F4
/BaseFont /Times-Italic
/FirstChar 0
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 675 675 675 675 675 300 300
250 333 420 500 500 833 778 333 333 333 500 675 250 333 250 278
500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 333 333 675 675 675 500
920 611 611 667 722 611 611 722 722 333 444 667 556 833 667 722
611 722 611 500 556 722 611 833 611 556 556 389 278 389 422 500
333 500 500 444 500 444 278 500 500 278 278 444 278 722 500 500
500 500 389 389 278 500 444 667 444 444 389 400 275 400 541 400
667 500 444 500 500 500 500 444 444 444 444 278 278 278 611 611
611 611 500 500 500 500 500 500 444 722 722 611 611 611 611 611
500 389 500 500 167 500 500 500 500 214 556 500 333 333 500 500
611 500 500 500 250 611 523 350 333 556 556 500 889 1000 722 500
500 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 500 333 333 300 333 333 333
889 667 500 250 250 250 500 389 556 444 500 556 389 760 760 980
333 889 333 276 333 333 722 722 556 722 944 310 722 722 722 722
722 667 556 500 750 278 750 750 278 500 667 500 278 500 500 275 ]
/Encoding 78 0 R
/FontDescriptor 79 0 R
>>
endobj
80 0 obj
<<
/Type /Encoding
/Differences [ 219 /Zcaron 135 /ccedilla 152 /ydieresis 243 /atilde 140 /icircumflex
31 /threesuperior 136 /ecircumflex 146 /thorn 138 /egrave 30 /twosuperior 130 /eacute
254 /otilde 155 /Aacute 147 /ocircumflex 217 /yacute 129 /udieresis 247 /threequarters
131 /acircumflex 190 /Eth 137 /edieresis 151 /ugrave 223 /trademark 149 /ograve 215 /scaron
228 /Idieresis 218 /uacute 133 /agrave 210 /ntilde 134 /aring 220 /zcaron 226 /Icircumflex
209 /Ntilde 150 /ucircumflex 159 /Ecircumflex 224 /Iacute 128 /Ccedilla 153 /Odieresis
214 /Scaron 176 /Edieresis 229 /Igrave 132 /adieresis 236 /Ograve 181 /Egrave 242 /Ydieresis
221 /registered 237 /Otilde 244 /onequarter 240 /Ugrave 239 /Ucircumflex 145 /Thorn
25 /divide 158 /Atilde 238 /Uacute 231 /Ocircumflex 29 /logicalnot 143 /Aring 139 /idieresis
252 /iacute 160 /aacute 27 /plusminus 26 /multiply 154 /Udieresis 28 /minus 204 /onesuperior
144 /Eacute 156 /Acircumflex 222 /copyright 157 /Agrave 148 /odieresis 253 /oacute 127 /degree
141 /igrave 201 /mu 230 /Oacute 192 /eth 142 /Adieresis 216 /Yacute 255 /brokenbar 246 /onehalf
]
>>
endobj
81 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Helvetica-Bold
/Flags 32
/FontBBox [ -170 -228 1003 962 ]
/MissingWidth 250
/StemV 140.00
/StemH 70.00
/ItalicAngle 0.00
/CapHeight 718
/XHeight 532
/Ascent 718
/Descent -207
/Leading 0
/MaxWidth 0
/AvgWidth 0
>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /Type1
/Name /F5
/BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold
/FirstChar 0
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278
278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 278 584 584 584 584 584 333 333
278 333 474 556 556 889 722 278 333 333 389 584 278 333 278 278
556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 333 333 584 584 584 611
975 722 722 722 722 667 611 778 722 278 556 722 611 833 722 778
667 778 722 667 611 722 667 944 667 667 611 333 278 333 584 556
278 556 611 556 611 556 333 611 611 278 278 556 278 889 611 611
611 611 389 556 333 611 556 778 556 556 500 389 280 389 584 400
722 611 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 278 278 278 722 722
667 667 611 611 611 611 611 611 556 778 722 722 722 722 722 667
556 333 556 556 167 556 556 556 556 238 500 556 333 333 611 611
667 556 556 556 278 667 556 350 278 500 500 556 1000 1000 722 611
611 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 611 333 333 333 333 333 333
1000 722 611 278 278 278 667 556 667 556 611 611 500 737 737 1000
278 1000 278 370 278 278 778 778 611 778 1000 365 778 778 722 722
722 889 667 556 834 278 834 834 278 611 944 611 278 611 611 280 ]
/Encoding 80 0 R
/FontDescriptor 81 0 R
>>
endobj
10 0 obj
<<
/Kids [3 0 R 11 0 R 14 0 R 18 0 R 21 0 R 24 0 R]
/Count 6
/Type /Pages
/Parent 82 0 R
>>
endobj
30 0 obj
<<
/Kids [27 0 R 31 0 R 34 0 R 37 0 R 40 0 R 43 0 R]
/Count 6
/Type /Pages
/Parent 82 0 R
>>
endobj
49 0 obj
<<
/Kids [46 0 R 50 0 R 53 0 R 56 0 R 59 0 R 62 0 R]
/Count 6
/Type /Pages
/Parent 82 0 R
>>
endobj
68 0 obj
<<
/Kids [65 0 R 69 0 R]
/Count 2
/Type /Pages
/Parent 82 0 R
>>
endobj
82 0 obj
<<
/Kids [10 0 R 30 0 R 49 0 R 68 0 R]
/Count 20
/Type /Pages
/MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
>>
endobj
2 0 obj
<<
/Type /Catalog
/Pages 82 0 R
>>
endobj
83 0 obj
<<
/CreationDate (Friday November 30, 2007 09:07:30)
/Creator (VERSACOMP R05.2)
/Producer (ECMP5)
>>
endobj
xref
0 84
0000000000 65535 f
0000084345 00000 n
0000097089 00000 n
0000004525 00000 n
0000000044 00000 n
0000004502 00000 n
0000085810 00000 n
0000088462 00000 n
0000090016 00000 n
0000092663 00000 n
0000096537 00000 n
0000006429 00000 n
0000004739 00000 n
0000006405 00000 n
0000009772 00000 n
0000006623 00000 n
0000009748 00000 n
0000095314 00000 n
0000014118 00000 n
0000009978 00000 n
0000014094 00000 n
0000018610 00000 n
0000014335 00000 n
0000018586 00000 n
0000022541 00000 n
0000018815 00000 n
0000022517 00000 n
0000026832 00000 n
0000022746 00000 n
0000026808 00000 n
0000096653 00000 n
0000031209 00000 n
0000027049 00000 n
0000031185 00000 n
0000035306 00000 n
0000031426 00000 n
0000035282 00000 n
0000040251 00000 n
0000035525 00000 n
0000040227 00000 n
0000044639 00000 n
0000040470 00000 n
0000044615 00000 n
0000049589 00000 n
0000044846 00000 n
0000049565 00000 n
0000053828 00000 n
0000049808 00000 n
0000053804 00000 n
0000096770 00000 n
0000058704 00000 n
0000054035 00000 n
0000058680 00000 n
0000063464 00000 n
0000058923 00000 n
0000063440 00000 n
0000067957 00000 n
0000063671 00000 n
0000067933 00000 n
0000072504 00000 n
0000068176 00000 n
0000072480 00000 n
0000077394 00000 n
0000072723 00000 n
0000077370 00000 n
0000081687 00000 n
0000077613 00000 n
0000081663 00000 n
0000096887 00000 n
0000084165 00000 n
0000081894 00000 n
0000084141 00000 n
0000084378 00000 n
0000085530 00000 n
0000087030 00000 n
0000088182 00000 n
0000089678 00000 n
0000089750 00000 n
0000091228 00000 n
0000092380 00000 n
0000093878 00000 n
0000095030 00000 n
0000096976 00000 n
0000097145 00000 n
trailer
<<
/Size 84
/Root 2 0 R
/Info 83 0 R
>>
startxref
97282
%%EOF
2 0 obj
<>
endobj
84 0 obj
<>
endobj
85 0 obj
<>stream
Friday November 30, 2007 09:07:30
ECMP5
VERSACOMP R05.2
2008-05-13T13:54:20-06:00
2008-05-13T13:54:20-06:00
2008-05-13T13:54:20-06:00
application/pdf
ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM V. MCCLELLAN
uuid:6a523a99-04c6-40c6-ade4-0cb9820ac893
uuid:2fa15f22-ef9b-410e-a175-5061dc962ab9
endstream
endobj
xref
2 1
0000099053 00000 n
84 2
0000099115 00000 n
0000099376 00000 n
trailer
<]/Prev 97282 >>
startxref
103138
%%EOF