| Cal.Rules of Court, Rule 5.664   California Codes California
        Rules of Court  Title 5.  Family and Juvenile Rules  Division 3.  Juvenile Rules  Chapter 12.  Indian Child Welfare
        Act   
 Rule 
        5.664. Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) 
 
 
  (a)
  Definitions;  25 U.S.C. §
  1903 
 
  As
  used in this rule, unless the context or subject matter
  otherwise requires: 
 
  (1)
  "Indian child" means an unmarried person under the age of
  18 who: 
 
  (A)
  Is a member of an Indian tribe;  or 
 
  (B)
  Is eligible for membership in an Indian tribe and is
  the biological child of a member of an Indian tribe. 
 
  (2)
  "Indian child's tribe" means: 
 
  (A)
  The Indian tribe in which the child is a member
  or is eligible for membership;  or 
 
  (B)
  In the case of an Indian child who is a
  member of or eligible for membership in more than one
  tribe, the Indian tribe with which the Indian child has
  more significant contacts. 
 
  (3)
  "Indian custodian" means any Indian person who has: 
 
  (A)
  Legal custody of an Indian child under tribal law or
  custom, or under state law;  or 
 
  (B)
  Temporary physical care, custody, and control of an Indian child
  whose parent or parents have transferred custody to that person. 
 
  (4)
  "Parent of an Indian child" means the biological parent of
  an Indian child or any Indian person who has lawfully
  adopted an Indian child, including adoptions under tribal law or
  custom.  (This definition does not include a non-Indian adoptive
  parent or an unwed alleged father where paternity has not
  been determined or acknowledged.) 
 
  (5)
  "Custody" means legal or physical custody or both as provided
  under state law or tribal law or custom. 
 
  (6)
  "Indian tribe" means any tribe, band, nation, or other organized
  group or community of Indians eligible for services provided to
  Indians by the Secretary of
    the Interior because of their status as Indians, including any
    Alaskan Native Villages as defined by section 1602(c) of title
    43 of the United States Code. 
 
  (7)
  "Extended family" means those persons defined by the law or
  custom of the Indian child's tribe or, in the absence
  of such law or custom, an adult grandparent, aunt, uncle,
  brother, sister, sister-in-law, brother-in-law, niece, nephew, first or second cousin,
  or stepparent of the Indian child. 
 
  (8)
  "Child custody proceeding" means and includes a proceeding at which
  the court considers foster care placement, appointment of a guardian,
  termination of parental rights, preadoptive placement, or adoptive placement. 
 
  (9)
  "Foster care placement" means any temporary placement from which a
  child may not be removed by the parent or Indian
  custodian on demand, including a shelter care home, a foster
  home, or an institution or the home of a guardian
  or conservator. 
 
  (10)
  "Qualified expert witness" means a person qualified to address the
  issue of whether continued custody by a parent or Indian
  custodian is likely to result in serious physical or emotional
  damage to the child.  Persons most likely to be
  considered such experts are: 
 
  (A)
  A member of a tribe with knowledge of Indian family
  organization and child rearing; 
 
  (B)
  A lay expert with substantial experience in Indian child and
  family services and extensive knowledge of the social and cultural
  standards and child-rearing practices of Indian tribes, specifically the child's
  tribe, if possible; 
 
  (C)
  A professional person with substantial education and experience in Indian
  child and family services and in the social and cultural
  standards of Indian tribes, specifically the child's tribe, if possible;
  or 
 
  (D)
  A professional person having substantial education and experience in the
  area of his or her specialty. 
 
  (11)
  "Act" means the Indian Child Welfare
  Act (25 U.S.C. §§
  1901-1963). 
 
  (12)
  "Tribal court" means a court with jurisdiction over child custody
  proceedings, identified as a Court of Indian Offenses, a court
  established and operated under the code or custom of an
  Indian tribe, or any other administrative body of a tribe
  that is vested with authority over child custody proceedings. 
  If applicable, the tribal court has met the requirements for
  resumption of jurisdiction over child custody proceedings as approved by
  the Department of the Interior. 
 
  (b)
  Applicability of rule;  25 U.S.C. §§
  1911, 1912 
 
  This
  rule applies to all proceedings under section 300 et seq.
  and to proceedings under section 601 and section 602 et
  seq. in which the child is at risk of entering
  foster care or is in foster care, including detention hearings,
  jurisdiction hearings, disposition hearings, reviews, hearings under section 366.26, and
  subsequent hearings affecting the status of the Indian child. 
 
  (c)
  Jurisdiction;  25 U.S.C. §
  1911 
 
  (1)
  If the Indian child resides or is domiciled on an
  Indian reservation that exercises exclusive jurisdiction under the act over
  child custody proceedings, the petition under section 300 must be
  dismissed. 
 
  (A)
  If the Indian child is temporarily off a reservation that
  exercises exclusive jurisdiction, the juvenile court must exercise temporary jurisdiction
  if there is an immediate threat of serious physical harm
  to the child. 
 
  (B)
  Absent extraordinary circumstances, temporary emergency custody must terminate within 90
  days, unless the court determines by clear and convincing evidence,
  including the testimony of at least one qualified expert witness, that
    return of the child is likely to cause serious damage
    to the child. 
 
  (C)
  The child must be returned immediately to the parent or
  Indian custodian when the emergency placement is no longer necessary
  to prevent serious harm to the child. 
 
  (2)
  If the Indian child is not domiciled or residing on
  a reservation that exercises exclusive jurisdiction, the tribe, parent, or
  Indian custodian may petition the court to transfer the proceedings
  to the tribal jurisdiction, and the juvenile court must transfer
  the proceedings to tribal jurisdiction unless there is good cause
  not to do so. 
 
  (A)
  Either parent may object to the transfer. 
 
  (B)
  The tribe may decline the transfer of the proceedings. 
 
  (3)
  If the tribe does not intervene or the tribal court
  does not request transfer to tribal jurisdiction, the court should
  proceed to exercise its jurisdiction regarding the Indian child under
  section 300 et seq., in accordance with the procedures and
  standards of proof as required by both juvenile court law
  and the act. 
 
  (d)
  Inquiry 
 
  The
  court, the county welfare department, and the probation department have
  an affirmative and continuing duty to inquire whether a child
  for whom a petition under section 300, 601, or 602
  is to be, or has been, filed is or may
  be an Indian child. 
 
  (1)
  In juvenile wardship proceedings, if the probation officer believes that
  the child is at risk of entering foster care or
  is in foster care, he or she must ask the
  child, if the child is old enough, and the parents
  or legal guardians whether the child may be an Indian
  child or may have Indian ancestors. 
 
  (2)
  In dependency cases, the social worker must ask the child,
  if the child is old enough, and the parents or
  legal guardians whether the child may be an Indian child
  or may have Indian ancestors. 
 
  (3)
  At the first appearance by a parent or guardian in
  any dependency case, or in juvenile wardship proceedings in which
  the child is at risk of entering foster care or
  is in foster care, the parent or guardian must be
  ordered to complete Parental
    Notification of Indian Status (Juvenile Court) (form JV-130). 
 
  (4)
  The circumstances that may provide probable cause for the court
  to believe the child is an Indian child include, but
  are not limited to, the following: 
 
  (A)
  A person having an interest in the child, including the
  child, an Indian tribe,
    an Indian organization, an officer of the court, or a
    public or private agency, informs the court or the county
    welfare agency or the probation department or provides information suggesting
    that the child is an Indian child; 
 
  (B)
  The residence of the child, the child's parents, or an
  Indian custodian is in a predominantly Indian community;  or 
 
  (C)
  The child or the child's family has received services or
  benefits from a tribe or services that are available to
  Indians from tribes or the federal government, such as the
  Indian Health Service. 
 
  (e)
  Petition 
 
  (1)
  Section 1(l)
    or 1(m) on either the initial or an amended Juvenile
      Dependency Petition (Version One) (form JV-100) or section 1(i) or 1(j) of the initial
        or an amended Juvenile
          Dependency Petition (Version Two) (form JV-110) must be checked if the county welfare department
            knows or has reason to know that the child may
            be a member of or eligible for membership in a
            federally recognized Indian tribe or if there is reason to
            believe the child may be of Indian ancestry, as appropriate. 
 
  (2)
  Section 1(m) or 1(n) on either the initial or an
  amended Juvenile
    Wardship Petition (form JV-600) must be checked if the county probation department
      knows or has reason to know that the child may
      be a member of or eligible for membership in a
      federally recognized Indian tribe or if there is reason to
      believe the child may be of Indian ancestry, as appropriate. 
 
  (3)
  If section 1(l)
    of the Juvenile
      Dependency Petition (Version One) (form JV-100) or section 1(i) of the Juvenile
        Dependency Petition (Version Two) (form JV-110) or section 1(m) of the Juvenile
          Wardship Petition (form JV-600) is checked, or if, on inquiry, or based
            on other information, the court has reason to know the
            child may be an Indian child, the court must proceed
            as if the child were an Indian child and must
            proceed with all dependency and wardship hearings, observing the Welfare
            and Institutions Code timelines while complying with the act and
            this rule. 
 
  (A)
  A determination by the identified tribe or tribes that the
  child is or is not an Indian child is definitive. 
 
  (B)
  If no particular tribe can be reasonably identified, a determination
  by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) that the child
  is not an Indian child is definitive. 
 
  (4)
  If section 1(m) of the Juvenile
    Dependency Petition (Version One) (form JV-100) is checked and section 1(l)
      is not, or section 1(j) of the Juvenile
        Dependency Petition (Version Two) (form JV-110) is checked and section 1(i) is not,
          or if section 1(n) of the Juvenile
            Wardship Petition (form JV-600) is checked and section 1(m) is not, notice
              of the proceedings to the Bureau of Indian Affairs and
              further inquiry regarding the possible Indian status of the child
              are the only requirements. 
 
  (f)
  Notice;  25 U.S.C. §
  1912 
 
  If
  there is reason to know that an Indian child is
  involved, the social worker or probation officer must send Notice
    of Involuntary Child Custody Proceedings for an Indian Child (Juvenile
    Court) (form JV-135) to the parent or legal guardian and Indian
      custodian of an Indian child, and the Indian child's tribe,
      in accordance with Welfare and Institutions Code section 224.2. 
 
                
 
  (g)
  Determination of status;  25 U.S.C. §
  1911 (Welf. & Inst. Code, §
  360.6(c)) 
 
  Determination
  of tribal membership or eligibility for membership is made exclusively
  by the tribe. 
 
  (1)
  A tribe's determination that the child is or is not
  a member of or eligible for membership in the tribe
  is conclusive. 
 
  (2)
  Information that the child is not enrolled in the tribe
  is not determinative of Indian child status. 
 
  (3)
  The tribe must be a federally recognized tribe, group, or
  community as defined by the Bureau of Indian Affairs of
  the Department of the Interior as eligible for services provided
  to Indians by the Secretary of the Interior because of
  their status as Indians, including any Alaskan Native Villages as
  defined by section 1602(c) of title 43 of the United
  States Code. 
 
  (4)
  Absent a contrary determination by the tribe, a determination by
  the BIA that a child is or is not an
  Indian is conclusive. 
 
  (5)
  The Indian Child Welfare
  Act applies when a tribe determines that an unmarried minor
  is: 
 
  (A)
  A member of an Indian tribe;  or 
 
  (B)
  Eligible for membership in an Indian tribe and a biological
  child of a member of an Indian tribe. 
 
  (h)
  Proceedings after notice;  25 U.S.C. §
  1911 
 
  If
  it is determined that the act applies, the juvenile court
  hearing must not proceed until at least 10 days after
  those entitled to notice under the act have received notice.
  If requested, the parent, Indian custodian, or tribe must
  be granted a continuance of up to 20 days to
  prepare for the proceeding. The tribe may intervene at any
  point in the proceeding. 
 
  (1)
  An indigent parent and an indigent Indian custodian have a
  right to court-appointed counsel. 
 
  (2)
  All parties, including the parent, Indian child, Indian custodian, and
  tribe, and their respective attorneys, have the right to examine
  all court documents related to the dependency case. 
 
  (i)
  Required procedures, findings, and orders for foster care placement and
  guardianships;  25 U.S.C. §
  1912 
 
  The
  court may not order foster care placement of an Indian
  child, or establish a guardianship of an Indian child, unless
  the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that continued
  custody with the parent or Indian custodian is likely to
  cause the Indian child serious emotional or physical damage. 
 
  (1)
  Testimony by a qualified expert witness is required. 
 
  (2)
  Stipulation by the parent or Indian custodian or failure to
  object may waive the requirement of producing evidence of the
  likelihood of serious damage only if the court is satisfied
  that the party has been fully advised of the requirements
  of the act and has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived
  them. 
 
  (3)
  Failure to meet non-Indian family and community child-rearing standards, or
  the existence of other behavior or conditions that meet the
  removal standards of section 361, will not support an order
  for placement absent the finding that continued custody with the
  parent or Indian custodian is likely to cause serious
    emotional or physical damage. 
 
  (4)
  In addition to the findings required under section 361, in
  order to place an Indian child out of the custody
  of a parent or Indian custodian, the court must find
  that active efforts have been made to provide remedial services
  and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of the
  Indian family, and that these efforts were unsuccessful.  Stipulation
  by the parent or Indian custodian or failure to object
  may waive the requirement of this finding only if the
  court is satisfied that the party has been fully advised
  of the requirements of the act and has knowingly, intelligently,
  and voluntarily waived them. 
 
  (A)
  The court must consider all available information regarding the prevailing
  social and cultural conditions of the Indian child's tribe. 
 
  (B)
  Efforts to provide services must include attempts to use the
  available resources of extended family members, the tribe, Indian social
  service agencies, and individual Indian caregivers. 
 
  (j)
  Placement of an Indian child in a foster care placement;
  25 U.S.C. §
  1912 
 
  If
  it is determined that the act applies, the court may
  not order foster care placement of an Indian child unless
  the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that continued
  custody with the parent or Indian custodian is likely to
  cause the Indian child serious emotional or physical damage. 
 
  (1)
  Testimony by a qualified expert witness is required. 
 
  (2)
  Stipulation by the parent, Indian custodian, or tribe or failure
  to object may waive the requirement of producing evidence of
  the likelihood of serious damage only if the court is
  satisfied that the party has been fully advised of the
  requirements of the act and has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
  waived them. 
 
  (3)
  If it is determined that the act applies, failure to
  meet non-Indian family and child-rearing community standards, or the existence
  of other behavior or conditions that meet the removal standards
  of section 361, will not support an order for placement
  absent the finding that continued custody with the parent or
  Indian custodian is likely to cause serious emotional or physical
  damage. 
 
  (k)
  Standards and preferences in placement of an Indian child; 
  25 U.S.C. §
  1915 
 
  Foster
  and adoptive placements of Indian children must follow a specified
  order in the absence of good cause to the contrary.
  Placement standards must be the prevailing social and cultural
  standards of the Indian community in which the parent or
  extended family member resides, or with which the parent or
  extended family member maintains social and cultural contacts.  The
  foster or preadoptive placement must be in the least restrictive
  setting, within reasonable proximity to the Indian child's home, and
  capable of meeting any special needs of the Indian child. 
 
  (1)
  In a foster or preadoptive placement, preference must be given
  in the following order: 
 
  (A)
  To a member of the Indian child's extended family; 
 
  (B)
  To a foster home licensed or approved by the Indian
  child's tribe; 
 
  (C)
  To a state- or county-licensed or certified Indian foster home;
  or 
 
  (D)
  To a children's institution approved by the tribe or operated
  by an Indian organization and offering a program to meet
  the Indian child's needs. 
 
  (2)
  In an adoptive placement, preference must be given in the
  following order: 
 
  (A)
  To a member of the Indian child's extended family; 
 
  (B)
  To other members of the Indian child's tribe;  or 
 
  (C)
  To other Indian families. 
 
  (3)
  An Indian child may be placed in a non-Indian home
  only if the court finds that a diligent search has
  failed to locate a suitable Indian home. 
 
  (4)
  The court may modify the preference order only for good
  cause, which may include the following considerations: 
 
  (A)
  The requests of the parent or Indian custodian; 
 
  (B)
  The requests of the Indian child; 
 
  (C)
  The extraordinary physical or emotional needs of the Indian child
  as established by a qualified expert witness;  or 
 
  (D)
  The unavailability of suitable families based on a diligent effort
  to identify families meeting the preference criteria. 
 
  (5)
  The burden of establishing good cause for the court to
  alter the preference order is on the party requesting that
  a different order be considered. 
 
  (6)
  The tribe, by resolution, may establish a different preference order,
  which, absent good cause, must be followed if it provides
  for the least restrictive setting. 
 
  (7)
  The preferences and wishes of the Indian child and the
  parent must be considered, and weight given to a consenting
  parent's request for anonymity. 
 
  (l) Active efforts;  25 U.S.C. §
  1912 
 
  In
  addition to the findings required under section 361, in order
  to place an Indian child out of the custody of
  a parent or Indian custodian, or to issue orders under
  section 366.26, the court must find that active efforts have
  been made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed
  to prevent the breakup of the Indian family, and that
  these efforts were unsuccessful. 
 
  (1)
  The court must consider the prevailing social and cultural conditions
  of the Indian child's tribe. 
 
  (2)
  Efforts to provide services must include attempts to use the
  available resources of extended family members, the tribe, Indian social
  service agencies, and individual Indian caregivers. 
 
  (m)
  Termination of parental rights;  25 U.S.C., §
  1912 
 
  The
  court may not terminate parental rights to an Indian child
  unless there is proof beyond a reasonable doubt that continued
  custody by the parent or Indian custodian
    is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage
    to the child. 
 
  (1)
  The evidence must be supported by the testimony of a
  qualified expert witness. 
 
  (2)
  Stipulation by the parent or Indian custodian or failure to
  object may waive the requirement of producing evidence of the
  likelihood of serious damage only if the court is satisfied
  that the party has been fully advised of the requirements
  of the act and has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived
  them. 
 
  (3)
  Consent to a voluntary termination of parental rights, relinquishment of
  parental rights, or consent to adoption must be executed in
  writing and recorded before a judicial officer of competent jurisdiction.
  The court must certify that the terms and consequences
  of the consent were explained in detail, in the language
  of the parent or Indian custodian, and fully understood by
  the parent or Indian custodian.  If confidentiality is requested
  or appropriate, the consent may be executed in chambers. 
 
  (4)
  In order to terminate parental rights to an Indian child,
  the court must find that active efforts have been made
  to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent
  the breakup of the Indian family, and
    that these efforts were unsuccessful.  Stipulation by the parent
    or Indian custodian or failure to object may waive the
    requirement of this finding only if the court is satisfied
    that the party has been fully advised of the requirements
    of the act and has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived
    them. 
 
  (n)
  Petition to invalidate orders of removal or termination of parental
  rights;  25 U.S.C., §
  1914 
 
  If
  it is determined that the act applies, the Indian child,
  a parent, an Indian custodian, or the child's tribe may
  petition any court of competent jurisdiction to invalidate a foster
  placement or termination of parental rights. 
 
  (1)
  If the Indian child is a dependent child of the
  juvenile court or the subject of a pending petition, the
  juvenile court is the only court of competent jurisdiction with
  the authority to hear the petition to invalidate the foster
  placement or termination of parental rights. 
 
  (2)
  If a final decree of adoption is set aside, or
  if the adoptive parents voluntarily
    consent to the termination of their parental rights, a biological
    parent or prior Indian custodian may petition for a return
    of custody of the Indian child. 
 
  (A)
  The court must grant the petition for return unless there
  is a showing that return is contrary to the best
  interest of the Indian child. 
 
  (B)
  The hearing on the petition to return must be conducted
  in accordance with the act and the relevant sections of
  this rule. 
 
  (o)
  Post-hearing actions;  25 U.S.C., §
  1916 
 
  Whenever
  an Indian child is removed from a foster home or
  institution for placement in a different foster home, institution, or
  preadoptive or adoptive home, the placement must be in accordance
  with the act and the relevant sections of this rule. 
 
  (p)
  Record keeping;  25 U.S.C., §
  1951 
 
  (1)
  After granting a decree of adoption of an Indian child,
  the court must provide
    the Secretary of the Interior with a copy of the
    decree and other information needed to show: 
 
  (A)
  The name and tribal affiliation of the Indian child; 
 
  (B)
  The names and addresses of the biological parents; 
 
  (C)
  The names and addresses of the adoptive parents;  and 
 
  (D)
  The agency maintaining files and records regarding the adoptive placement. 
 
  (2)
  If a biological parent has executed an affidavit requesting that
  his or her identity remain confidential, the court must provide
  the affidavit to the Secretary of the Interior, who must
  ensure the confidentiality of the information. 
 
  CREDIT(S)  
 
  (Formerly
  Rule 1439, adopted, eff. Jan. 1, 1995.  As amended,
  eff. Jan. 1, 1997;  Jan. 1, 1999;  Jan.
  1, 2001;  Jan. 1, 2005.  Renumbered Rule 5.664
  and amended, eff. Jan. 1, 2007. As amended, eff. Feb. 23, 2007.) |