Cal.Welf. & Inst.Code § 361
California Codes
Welfare
and Institutions Code
Division
2. Children
Part 1. Delinquents and Wards of the Juvenile Court
Chapter 2. Juvenile Court Law
Article 10. Dependent Children--Judgments and Orders
§
361. Limitations on parental or guardian control; right to
make educational decisions; appointment of responsible adult; relinquishment
of child; grounds for removal of child; placement;
findings
(a) In all cases in which a minor is adjudged
a dependent child of the court on the ground that
the minor is a person described by Section 300, the
court may limit the control to be exercised over the
dependent child by any parent or guardian and shall by
its order clearly and specifically set forth all those limitations.
Any limitation on the right of the parent or
guardian to make educational decisions for the child shall be
specifically addressed in the court
order. The limitations may not exceed those necessary to
protect the child. If the court specifically limits the
right of the parent or guardian to make educational decisions
for the child, the court shall at the same time
appoint a responsible adult to make educational decisions for the
child until one of the following occurs:
(1)
The minor reaches 18 years of age, unless the child
chooses not to make educational decisions for himself or herself,
or is deemed by the court to be incompetent.
(2)
Another responsible adult is appointed to make educational decisions for
the minor pursuant to this section.
(3)
The right of the parent or guardian to make educational
decisions for the minor is fully restored.
(4)
A successor guardian or conservator is appointed.
(5)
The child is placed into a planned permanent living arrangement
pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (g) of Section 366.21,
Section 366.22, or Section 366.26, at which time the foster
parent, relative caretaker, or nonrelative extended family member as defined
in Section 362.7, has the right to represent the child
in educational matters pursuant to Section 56055 of the Education
Code.
An
individual who would have a conflict of interest in representing
the child may not be appointed to make educational decisions.
For purposes of this section, "an individual who would
have a conflict of interest," means a person having any
interests that might restrict or bias his or her ability
to make educational decisions, including, but not limited to, those
conflicts of interest prohibited by Section 1126 of the Government
Code, and the receipt of compensation or attorneys' fees for
the provision of services pursuant to this section. A
foster parent may not be deemed to have a conflict
of interest solely because he or she receives compensation for
the provision of services pursuant
to this section.
If
the court is unable to appoint a responsible adult to
make educational decisions for the child and paragraphs (1) to
(5), inclusive, do not apply, and the child has either
been referred to the local educational agency for special education
and related services, or has a valid individualized education program,
the court shall refer the child to the local educational
agency for appointment of a surrogate parent pursuant to Section
7579.5 of the Government Code.
If
the court cannot identify a responsible adult to make educational
decisions for the child, the appointment of a surrogate parent
as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 56050 of the
Education Code is not warranted, and there is no foster
parent to exercise the authority granted by Section 56055 of
the Education Code, the court may, with the input of
any interested person, make educational decisions for the child.
All
educational and school placement decisions shall seek to ensure that
the child is in the least restrictive educational programs and
has access to the academic resources, services, and extracurricular and
enrichment activities that are available to all pupils. In
all instances, educational and school placement decisions shall be based
on the best interests of the child.
(b)
Subdivision (a) does not limit the ability of a parent
to voluntarily relinquish his or her child to the State
Department of Social Services or to a licensed county adoption
agency at any time while the child is a dependent
child of the juvenile court, if the department or agency
is willing to accept the relinquishment.
(c)
A dependent child may not be taken from the physical
custody of his or her parents or guardian or guardians
with whom the child resides at the time the petition
was initiated, unless the juvenile court finds clear and convincing
evidence of any of the following circumstances listed in paragraphs
(1) to (5), inclusive, and, in an Indian child custody
proceeding, paragraph (6):
(1)
There is or would be a substantial danger to the
physical health, safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of
the minor if the minor were returned home, and there
are no reasonable means by which the minor's physical health
can be protected without removing the minor from the minor's
parent's or guardian's physical custody. The fact that a
minor has been adjudicated a dependent child of the court
pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 300 shall constitute prima
facie evidence that the minor cannot be safely left in
the physical custody of the parent or guardian with whom
the minor resided at the time of injury. The
court shall consider, as a reasonable means to protect the
minor, the option of removing an offending parent or guardian
from the home. The court shall also consider, as
a reasonable means to protect the minor, allowing a nonoffending
parent or guardian to retain physical custody as long as
that parent or guardian presents a plan acceptable to the
court demonstrating that he or she will be able to
protect the child from future harm.
(2)
The parent or guardian of the minor is unwilling to
have physical custody of the minor, and the parent or
guardian has been notified that if the minor remains
out of their physical custody for the period specified in
Section 366.26, the minor may be declared permanently free from
their custody and control.
(3)
The minor is suffering severe emotional damage, as indicated by
extreme anxiety, depression, withdrawal, or untoward aggressive behavior toward himself
or herself or others, and there are no reasonable means
by which the minor's emotional health may be protected without
removing the minor from the physical custody of his or
her parent or guardian.
(4)
The minor or a sibling of the minor has been
sexually abused, or is deemed to be at substantial risk
of being sexually abused, by a parent, guardian, or member
of his or her household, or other person known to
his or her parent, and there are no reasonable means
by which the minor can be protected from further sexual
abuse or a substantial risk of sexual abuse without removing
the minor from his or her parent or guardian, or
the minor does not wish to return to his or
her parent or guardian.
(5)
The minor has been left without any provision for his
or her support, or a parent who has been incarcerated
or institutionalized cannot arrange for the care of the minor,
or a relative or other adult custodian with whom the
child has been left by the parent is unwilling or
unable to provide care or support for the child and
the whereabouts of the parent is unknown and reasonable efforts
to locate him or her have been unsuccessful.
(6)
In an Indian child custody proceeding, continued custody of the
child by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to
result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child,
and that finding is supported by testimony of a "qualified
expert witness" as described in Section 224.6.
(A)
Stipulation by the parent, Indian custodian, or the Indian child's
tribe, or failure to object, may waive the requirement of
producing evidence of the likelihood of serious damage only if
the court is satisfied that the party has been fully
advised of the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and has knowingly,
intelligently, and voluntarily waived
them.
(B)
Failure to meet non-Indian family and child-rearing community standards, or
the existence of other behavior or conditions that meet the
removal standards of this section, will not support an order
for placement in the absence of the finding in this
paragraph.
(d)
The court shall make a determination as to whether reasonable
efforts were made to prevent or to eliminate the need
for removal of the minor from his or her home
or, if the minor is removed for one of the
reasons stated in paragraph (5) of subdivision (c), whether it
was reasonable under the circumstances not to make any of
those efforts, or, in the case of an Indian child
custody proceeding, whether active efforts as required in Section 361.7
were made and that these efforts have proved unsuccessful.
The court shall state the facts on which the decision
to remove the minor is based.
(e)
The court shall make all of the findings required by
subdivision (a) of Section
366 in either of the following circumstances:
(1)
The minor has been taken from the custody of his
or her parent or guardian and has been living in
an out-of-home placement pursuant to Section 319.
(2)
The minor has been living in a voluntary out-of-home placement
pursuant to Section 16507.4.
CREDIT(S)
(Added
by Stats.1976, c. 1068, p. 4773, §
10. Amended by Stats.1982, c. 978, §
20, eff. Sept. 13, 1982, operative July 1, 1982;
Stats.1984, c. 867, §
1; Stats.1984, c. 1246, §
4; Stats.1984, c. 1608, §
4, eff. Sept. 30, 1984; Stats.1984, c. 1608, §
12, eff. Sept. 30, 1984, operative Jan. 1, 1985; Stats.1985,
c. 440, §
2; Stats.1986, c. 1122, §
11; Stats.1987, c. 1485, §
38; Stats.1990, c. 182 (A.B.1528), §
7; Stats.1992, c. 382 (S.B.1646), §
2; Stats.1996, c. 1084 (S.B.1516), §
4; Stats.1996,
c. 1139 (A.B.2647), §
8.5; Stats.1997, c. 793 (A.B.1544), §
15; Stats.2002, c. 180 (A.B.886), §
2; Stats.2003, c. 862 (A.B.490), §
10; Stats.2005, c. 639 (A.B.1261), §
10; Stats.2006, c. 838 (S.B.678), §
48.) |